Newens A J, Forster D P, Kay D W
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Aug;47(4):293-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.4.293.
To assess the value of death certification for the epidemiological study of dementia, the frequency with which the condition was recorded on death certificates of patients diagnosed with some form of dementia before the age of 65 years was studied. A further objective was to identify variables associated with failure to record dementia on the certificate.
A cohort of patients with presenile dementia, differentiated by a clinical algorithm applied to hospital case records, was traced through the National Health Service Central Registry and details of certified causes of death were obtained.
The Northern Regional Health Authority in England.
Prevalent cases of presenile dementia resident in the northern health region during 1986 traced up to April 1992.
The underlying cause of death was recorded as dementia or as Alzheimer's disease in 53% of cases of clinically diagnosed presenile Alzheimer's disease, 33% of cases of presenile vascular dementia, and 10% of cases of presenile dementia secondary to another neurological condition. Dementia or Alzheimer's disease was recorded in any part of the certificate in 75% of cases of Alzheimer's disease, 52% of vascular dementia, 33% of other dementias, and in 65% of cases overall. Dementia or a cerebral condition of a kind that can result in dementia was recorded in 80% of all cases. Failure to mention dementia was related to the clinical type of dementia, shorter duration of illness, and earlier period of study.
The underlying cause of death seriously understates the frequency of dementia, but when the recording of other brain disease is taken into account the presence of potentially dementing brain disease is recorded much more frequently. It is suggested that coding chronic conditions present at death, such as dementia, in addition to those causing or contributing to death would improve the value of death certificates for epidemiological purposes.
为评估死亡证明在痴呆症流行病学研究中的价值,研究了65岁前被诊断患有某种形式痴呆症的患者死亡证明上记录该病症的频率。另一个目的是确定与死亡证明上未记录痴呆症相关的变量。
通过国家卫生服务中央登记处追踪一组早老性痴呆症患者,这些患者通过应用于医院病例记录的临床算法进行区分,并获取经认证的死亡原因细节。
英国北部地区卫生局。
1986年居住在北部健康地区的早老性痴呆症现患病例,追踪至1992年4月。
在临床诊断为早老性阿尔茨海默病的病例中,53%的病例死亡根本原因被记录为痴呆症或阿尔茨海默病;早老性血管性痴呆病例中为33%;继发于其他神经系统疾病的早老性痴呆症病例中为10%。在75%的阿尔茨海默病病例、52%的血管性痴呆病例、33%的其他痴呆症病例以及总体65%的病例中,死亡证明的任何部分记录了痴呆症或阿尔茨海默病。在所有病例的80%中记录了痴呆症或可能导致痴呆症的脑部疾病。未提及痴呆症与痴呆症的临床类型、病程较短以及研究早期有关。
死亡根本原因严重低估了痴呆症的发生频率,但如果将其他脑部疾病的记录考虑在内,潜在致痴呆性脑部疾病的记录频率会高得多。建议除了记录导致或促成死亡的疾病外,还对死亡时存在的慢性病(如痴呆症)进行编码,这将提高死亡证明在流行病学方面的价值。