Celik Sükrü, Kaplan Sahin, Yilmaz Remzi, Erdogan Turan, Kiris Abdulkadir
KTU Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Trabzon, Turkey.
Angiology. 2007;58(6):671-6. doi: 10.1177/0003319707308895. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
Large artery stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality and a major determinant of pulse pressure. The stiff aorta may result in greater systolic, lower diastolic, and wider pulse pressures, which may decrease coronary artery perfusion. Shear stress has been implicated in the development of coronary collateral. Decreased coronary perfusion may reduce shear stress and thus collateral formation. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between the development of coronary collateral and aortic stiffness in patients with coronary artery disease. In 106 patients with at least one coronary artery stenosis of 90% or greater, collateral vessels were assessed angiographically by the Rentrop grading (grade 0-3), establishing two groups: 50 patients with poor collateral vessels (Rentrop grade 0 or 1), and 56 patients with good collateral vessels (Rentrop grade 2 or 3). Internal aortic root diameters were measured at 3 cm above the aortic valve by use of two-dimensional guided M-mode transthoracic echocardiography, and arterial pressure was measured simultaneously at the brachial artery by sphygmomanometry. Two indexes of the aortic elastic properties were measured: aortic distensibility index was calculated by use of the formula: 2 x (systolic diameter - diastolic diameter)/(diastolic diameter) x (pulse pressure) in cm(- 2)dyn(-1)10(-6). The aortic stiffness index was calculated by: (systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure)/pulsatile change in diameter/diastolic diameter. The aortic distensibility index and the aortic stiffness index were not significantly different between the patients with poor collateral vessels and those with good collateral vessels (5.1 +/-2.3 vs 5.7 +/-3.3 cm(-2)dyn( -1)10(-6), p = 0.31; 4.02 +/-2.3 vs 4.43 +/-3.7, p = 0.49, respectively). There were no significant differences regarding the aortic elastic properties between the patients with poor collateral vessels and those with good collateral vessels, suggesting that collateral formation is a complex phenomenon consisting of several distinct processes.
大动脉僵硬度是心血管死亡率的独立预测因素,也是脉压的主要决定因素。僵硬的主动脉可能导致收缩压升高、舒张压降低以及脉压增宽,这可能会减少冠状动脉灌注。剪切应力与冠状动脉侧支循环的形成有关。冠状动脉灌注减少可能会降低剪切应力,从而减少侧支循环的形成。本研究的目的是评估冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉侧支循环的形成与主动脉僵硬度之间的关系。在106例至少有一处冠状动脉狭窄达90%或以上的患者中,通过Rentrop分级(0 - 3级)对侧支血管进行血管造影评估,分为两组:50例侧支血管较差的患者(Rentrop分级0或1级)和56例侧支血管良好的患者(Rentrop分级2或3级)。使用二维引导的M型经胸超声心动图在主动脉瓣上方3 cm处测量主动脉根部内径,并通过血压计同时测量肱动脉处的动脉压。测量了两个主动脉弹性特性指标:主动脉扩张性指数通过公式计算:2×(收缩期直径 - 舒张期直径)/(舒张期直径)×(脉压),单位为cm(- 2)dyn(-1)10(-6)。主动脉僵硬度指数通过以下公式计算:(收缩压/舒张压)/直径的搏动变化/舒张期直径。侧支血管较差的患者与侧支血管良好的患者之间的主动脉扩张性指数和主动脉僵硬度指数无显著差异(分别为5.1±2.3 vs 5.7±3.3 cm(-2)dyn( -1)10(-6),p = 0.31;4.02±2.3 vs 4.43±3.7,p = 0.49)。侧支血管较差的患者与侧支血管良好的患者之间在主动脉弹性特性方面无显著差异,这表明侧支循环的形成是一个由几个不同过程组成的复杂现象。