Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病对血压正常的糖尿病患者主动脉弹性特性的影响:多普勒组织成像研究

Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on aortic elastic properties in normotensive diabetes: Doppler tissue imaging study.

作者信息

Mahfouz Badran Hala, Elnoamany Mohamed

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufiya University, Shebin Elkom, Egypt.

出版信息

J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Dec;19(12):1471-81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.06.004.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The stiffening of aorta and other central arteries is a potential risk factor for increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The association of hypertension with type 2 diabetes may obscure the degree to which diabetes alone contributes to impaired arterial function. This study examined whether the presence of type 2 diabetes alone is associated with an impaired aortic mechanical function in patients with or without coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

In all, 154 patients were recruited and assigned to groups A (n = 46, type 2 diabetes with no CAD), B (n = 64, nondiabetic CAD), or C (n = 44, diabetes with CAD) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy participants were enrolled in a control group. Patients were recruited from those sent for coronary angiography. CAD was excluded for group A. Pulse pressure, aortic strain, and distensibility were calculated from the aortic diameters measured by echocardiography and blood pressure obtained by sphygmomanometer. Aortic wall systolic velocity was measured using pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging.

RESULTS

Pulse pressure was significantly higher in patient groups A, B, and C in comparison with control group (40.2 +/- 9, 40.1 +/- 11, and 50.2 +/- 13 vs 35.5 +/- 9 mm Hg [P < .01], respectively). The pulsatile change in the aortic diameter and distensibility were less in the patient groups than in the control group (11 +/- 4%, 8 +/- 5%, and 8 +/- 4% vs 17 +/- 9% [P<.001], and 6 +/- 2, 6 +/- 1, and 3 +/- 2 vs 10 cm(2)/dyne/10(3), respectively). In addition, the aortic wall systolic velocity was significantly lower in patient groups compared with control group (6 +/- 2, 6.1 +/- 1, and 5.1 +/- 1 vs 8.5 +/- 1.5 cm/s [P < .01], respectively). Although aortic function parameters were very declined for group C, there was no significant difference between groups A and B that reflected equivalent risk. In diabetic groups A and C, aortic strain, distensibility, and aortic wall systolic velocity showed strong negative correlation with the duration of diabetes (r = -.53, r = -.68, and r = -.56, respectively) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HBA(1)) (r=-.64 [P < .01], r = -.77 [P < .001], and r = -.57 [P < .01], respectively).

CONCLUSION

The increased aortic stiffness that affects patients with type 2 diabetes seems to be an early event that may explain why patients with diabetes have a particularly high risk of developing cardiovascular complications. Poor glycemic control and duration have detrimental effect on aortic elastic properties.

摘要

目的

主动脉及其他中心动脉的硬化是心血管疾病发病率和死亡率增加的潜在危险因素。高血压与2型糖尿病的关联可能掩盖了仅糖尿病对动脉功能受损的影响程度。本研究调查了在有或无冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者中,仅2型糖尿病的存在是否与主动脉机械功能受损有关。

方法

共招募了154名患者,分为A组(n = 46,2型糖尿病无CAD)、B组(n = 64,非糖尿病CAD)或C组(n = 44,糖尿病合并CAD),并将20名年龄和性别匹配的健康参与者纳入对照组。患者从接受冠状动脉造影的人群中招募。A组排除CAD。通过超声心动图测量的主动脉直径和血压计测量的血压计算脉压、主动脉应变和扩张性。使用脉冲波多普勒组织成像测量主动脉壁收缩速度。

结果

与对照组相比,A组、B组和C组患者的脉压显著更高(分别为40.2±9、40.1±11和50.2±13 vs 35.5±9 mmHg [P <.01])。患者组主动脉直径的搏动变化和扩张性低于对照组(分别为11±4%、8±5%和8±4% vs 17±9% [P<.001],以及6±2、6±1和3±2 vs 10 cm²/dyne/10³)。此外,与对照组相比,患者组的主动脉壁收缩速度显著更低(分别为6±2、6.1±1和5.1±1 vs 8.5±1.5 cm/s [P <.01])。虽然C组的主动脉功能参数下降非常明显,但A组和B组之间没有显著差异,反映出风险相当。在糖尿病A组和C组中,主动脉应变、扩张性和主动脉壁收缩速度与糖尿病病程(分别为r = -.53、r = -.68和r = -.56)和糖化血红蛋白(HBA₁)(分别为r=-.64 [P <.01]、r = -.77 [P <.001]和r = -.57 [P <.01])呈强烈负相关。

结论

影响2型糖尿病患者的主动脉僵硬度增加似乎是一个早期事件,这可能解释了为什么糖尿病患者发生心血管并发症的风险特别高。血糖控制不佳和病程对主动脉弹性特性有不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验