Department for Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Cephalalgia. 2021 Jul;41(8):879-893. doi: 10.1177/0333102421989620. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of acupuncture and medical training therapy alone and in combination with those of usual care on the pain sensation of patients with frequent episodic and chronic tension-type headache.
This was a prospective single-centre randomised controlled trial with four balanced treatment arms. The allocation was carried out by pre-generated randomisation lists in the ratio 1:1:1:1 with different permutation block sizes.
The study was undertaken in the outpatient clinic of Rehabilitation Medicine of the Hannover Medical School. Ninety-six adult patients with tension-type headache were included and randomised into usual care (n = 24), acupuncture (n = 24), medical training (n = 24), and combination of acupuncture and medical training (n = 24). One patient was excluded from analysis because of withdrawing her/his consent, leaving 95 patients for intention to treat analysis. Each therapy arm consisted of 6 weeks of treatment with 12 interventions. Follow-up was at 3 and 6 months.
Pain intensity (average, maximum and minimum), frequency of headache, responder rate (50% frequency reduction), duration of headache and use of headache medication. The combination of acupuncture and medical training therapy significantly reduced mean pain intensity compared to usual care (mean = -38%, standard deviation = 25%, = 0.012). Comparable reductions were observed for maximal pain intensity (-25%, standard deviation = 20%, 0.014) and for minimal pain intensity (-35%, standard deviation = 31%, 0.03). In contrast, neither acupuncture nor medical training therapy differed significantly from usual care. No between-group differences were found in headache frequency, mean duration of headache episodes, and pain medication intake. At 3 months, the majority of all patients showed a reduction of at least 50% in headache frequency. At 6 months, significantly higher responder rates were found in all intervention groups compared to usual care.
In contrast to monotherapy, only the combination of acupuncture and medical training therapy was significantly superior in reduction of pain intensity compared to usual care. Registered on 11 February 2019. German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00016723.
本研究旨在比较针刺与单纯医学训练疗法以及与常规治疗相结合对频发发作性和慢性紧张型头痛患者疼痛感觉的影响。
这是一项前瞻性单中心随机对照试验,有四个平衡的治疗组。通过预先生成的随机化列表,按照 1:1:1:1 的比例分配,采用不同的随机分组大小。
研究在汉诺威医学院康复医学的门诊进行。纳入 96 例成人紧张型头痛患者,并随机分为常规治疗组(n=24)、针刺组(n=24)、医学训练组(n=24)和针刺联合医学训练组(n=24)。1 例患者因退出研究而被排除在分析之外,因此 95 例患者接受意向治疗分析。每个治疗组包括 6 周的治疗,共 12 次干预。随访时间为 3 个月和 6 个月。
疼痛强度(平均、最大和最小)、头痛频率、应答率(频率降低 50%)、头痛持续时间和头痛药物使用。与常规治疗相比,针刺联合医学训练疗法显著降低了平均疼痛强度(平均降幅为-38%,标准差为 25%,P=0.012)。最大疼痛强度(-25%,标准差为 20%,P=0.014)和最小疼痛强度(-35%,标准差为 31%,P=0.03)也观察到类似的降幅。相比之下,针刺或医学训练疗法与常规治疗均无显著差异。头痛频率、头痛发作平均持续时间和止痛药摄入方面,各组间无差异。在 3 个月时,所有患者的头痛频率均有至少 50%的降低。在 6 个月时,与常规治疗相比,所有干预组的应答率均显著更高。
与单独治疗相比,只有针刺联合医学训练疗法在降低疼痛强度方面明显优于常规治疗。2019 年 2 月 11 日注册。德国临床试验注册中心,DRKS00016723。