Metselaar Mick, Maat Bert, Verschuure Hans, Dreschler Wouter A, Feenstra Louw
Department of Otolaryngology/Audiological Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jan;265(1):21-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0494-7. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
Although a large number of fitting procedures have been developed and are nowadays generally applied in modern hearing aid fitting technology, little is known about their effectiveness in comparison with each other. This paper argues the need for comparative validation studies on hearing aid fitting procedures based on the design of a randomized clinical trial and carried out in a large-scale clinical population. These studies are hard to conduct but can provide detailed information on the various aspects of the rehabilitation with hearing aids. The design of several recently reported comparative studies of hearing aid fitting procedures will be reviewed. This gives rise to a number of comments on aspects like, study design, composition of the study population and definition of outcome measures rather than on the outcome or conclusions of these studies themselves.
尽管已经开发出大量的适配程序,并且如今这些程序普遍应用于现代助听器适配技术中,但对于它们相互之间的有效性却知之甚少。本文基于一项随机临床试验的设计,并在大规模临床人群中开展研究,论证了对助听器适配程序进行比较验证研究的必要性。这些研究很难开展,但可以提供有关助听器康复各个方面的详细信息。本文将对近期报道的几项关于助听器适配程序的比较研究设计进行综述。这引发了对诸如研究设计、研究人群构成和结果测量定义等方面的一些评论,而非针对这些研究本身的结果或结论。