Agarwal Rajiv, Andersen Martin J, Light Robert P
Indiana University School of Medicine and Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Ind. 46202, USA.
Am J Nephrol. 2008;28(2):210-7. doi: 10.1159/000110090. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
Blood pressure (BP) measurements obtained outside the dialysis unit are prognostically superior. Whether it is the greater number of measurements made outside the dialysis unit that correlates with prognosis or whether BPs outside dialysis units are ecologically more valid is unknown.
A prospective cohort study was conducted in 133 patients on chronic hemodialysis. BP was measured by the patients at home for 1 week, over an interdialytic interval by ambulatory recording, and by 'routine' and standardized methods in the dialysis unit for 2 weeks. Up to 6 BPs were randomly selected from a 44-hour recording of ambulatory or 1-week recording of home BPs, such that the dialysis unit BPs were exactly matched to the number of ambulatory or home BPs. The relationship with left ventricular hypertrophy and all-cause mortality was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 46 patients (31%) died. A BP change of 10/5 mm Hg increased the risk of all-cause mortality by 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.38)/1.18 (95% CI 1.05-1.31) with the average of the 44-hour recording and 1.20 (95% CI 1.07-1.34)/1.15 (95% CI 1.03-1.27) when up to 6 random BPs from the same ambulatory recording were drawn and averaged. With home BPs the hazard ratios were 1.17/1.15 per 10/5 mm Hg increase in BP with the average of 1-week recording and 1.18/1.13 when up to 6 random BPs were drawn and averaged. Limited duration ambulatory BP monitoring of any 6-hour interval during the first 24 h or 4-day home BP recorded after the midweek dialysis was similarly predictive of all-cause mortality.
In patients on hemodialysis, the location, not the quantity, of the BP recordings obtained outside the dialysis unit is associated with target organ damage and mortality.
在透析单元外测得的血压(BP)对预后的预测价值更高。尚不清楚是透析单元外更多的测量次数与预后相关,还是透析单元外的血压在生态学上更具有效性。
对133例慢性血液透析患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。患者在家中通过动态记录在透析间期测量血压1周,并在透析单元采用“常规”和标准化方法测量血压2周。从44小时的动态记录或1周的家庭血压记录中随机选取多达6次血压测量值,使透析单元的血压与动态或家庭血压的测量次数完全匹配。分别使用受试者工作特征曲线和Cox比例风险分析来分析与左心室肥厚和全因死亡率的关系。在中位随访24个月期间,46例患者(31%)死亡。血压变化10/5 mmHg时,44小时记录平均值对应的全因死亡风险增加1.22(95%CI 1.07-1.38)/1.18(95%CI 1.05-1.31),从同一动态记录中抽取多达6次随机血压测量值并求平均值时对应的全因死亡风险增加1.20(95%CI 1.07-1.34)/1.15(95%CI 1.03-1.27)。对于家庭血压,血压每升高10/5 mmHg,1周记录平均值对应的风险比为1.17/1.15,抽取多达6次随机血压测量值并求平均值时对应的风险比为1.18/1.13。透析周中后记录的前24小时内任何6小时间隔的有限时长动态血压监测或4天家庭血压同样可预测全因死亡率。
在血液透析患者中,透析单元外血压测量的位置而非数量与靶器官损害和死亡率相关。