Georgianos Panagiotis I, Vaios Vasilios, Sgouropoulou Vasiliki, Eleftheriadis Theodoros, Tsalikakis Dimitrios G, Liakopoulos Vassilios
Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, 1st Department of Medicine, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, 41222 Larissa, Greece.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;12(12):2961. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122961.
Whereas hypertension is an established cardiovascular risk factor in the general population, the contribution of increased blood pressure (BP) to the huge burden of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients receiving dialysis continues to be debated. In a large part, this controversy is attributable to particular difficulties in the accurate diagnosis of hypertension. The reverse epidemiology of hypertension in dialysis patients is based on evidence from large cohort studies showing that routine predialysis or postdialysis BP measurements exhibit a U-shaped or J-shaped association with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. However, substantial evidence supports the notion that home or ambulatory BP measurements are superior to dialysis-unit BP recordings in diagnosing hypertension, in detecting evidence of target-organ damage and in prognosticating the all-cause death risk. In the first part of this article, we explore the accuracy of different methods of BP measurement in diagnosing hypertension among patients on dialysis. In the second part, we describe how the epidemiology of hypertension is modified when the assessment of BP is based on dialysis-unit versus home or ambulatory recordings.
虽然高血压在普通人群中是一种既定的心血管危险因素,但血压升高对接受透析患者心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的巨大负担的影响仍存在争议。在很大程度上,这种争议归因于高血压准确诊断存在的特殊困难。透析患者高血压的反向流行病学基于大型队列研究的证据,这些研究表明,常规透析前或透析后血压测量与心血管或全因死亡率呈U形或J形关联。然而,大量证据支持这样的观点,即在诊断高血压、检测靶器官损害证据以及预测全因死亡风险方面,家庭或动态血压测量优于透析单元血压记录。在本文的第一部分,我们探讨了不同血压测量方法在诊断透析患者高血压方面的准确性。在第二部分,我们描述了当基于透析单元与家庭或动态记录来评估血压时,高血压的流行病学如何变化。