Mamikonyan Eugenia, Siderowf Andrew D, Duda John E, Potenza Marc N, Horn Stacy, Stern Matthew B, Weintraub Daniel
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mov Disord. 2008 Jan;23(1):75-80. doi: 10.1002/mds.21770.
Recent studies have linked dopamine agonist (DA) usage with the development of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Little is known about optimal management strategies or the long-term outcomes of affected patients. To report on the clinical interventions and long-term outcomes of PD patients who developed an ICD after DA initiation. Subjects contacted by telephone for a follow-up interview after a mean time period of 29.2 months. They were administered a modified Minnesota Impulse Disorder Interview for compulsive buying, gambling, and sexuality, and also self-rated changes in their ICD symptomatology. Baseline and follow-up dopamine replacement therapy use was recorded and verified by chart review. Of 18 subjects, 15 (83.3%) participated in the follow-up interview. At follow-up, patients were receiving a significantly lower DA levodopa equivalent daily dosage (LEDD) (Z = -3.1, P = 0.002) and a higher daily levodopa dosage (Z = -1.9, P = 0.05), but a similar total LEDD dosage (Z = -0.47, P = 0.64) with no changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score (Z = -1.3, P = 0.19). As part of ICD management, 12 (80.0%) patients discontinued or significantly decreased DA treatment, all of whom experienced full or partial remission of ICD symptoms by self-report, and 10 (83.3%) of whom no longer met diagnostic criteria for an ICD. For PD patients who develop an ICD in the context of DA treatment, discontinuing or significantly decreasing DA exposure, even when offset by an increase in levodopa treatment, is associated with remission of or significant reduction in ICD behaviors without worsening in motor symptoms.
近期研究已将多巴胺激动剂(DA)的使用与帕金森病(PD)患者冲动控制障碍(ICD)的发生联系起来。对于最佳管理策略或受影响患者的长期预后知之甚少。本研究旨在报告在开始使用DA后发生ICD的PD患者的临床干预措施和长期预后。平均随访29.2个月后,通过电话联系受试者进行随访访谈。对他们进行了针对强迫性购物、赌博和性行为的改良明尼苏达冲动障碍访谈,并让他们对自己ICD症状的变化进行自评。通过查阅病历记录并核实基线和随访时的多巴胺替代治疗使用情况。18名受试者中,15名(83.3%)参与了随访访谈。随访时,患者接受的DA左旋多巴等效日剂量(LEDD)显著降低(Z = -3.1,P = 0.002),左旋多巴日剂量升高(Z = -1.9,P = 0.05),但总LEDD剂量相似(Z = -0.47,P = 0.64),统一帕金森病评定量表运动评分无变化(Z = -1.3,P = 0.19)。作为ICD管理的一部分,12名(80.0%)患者停用或显著减少了DA治疗,所有患者通过自我报告均经历了ICD症状的完全或部分缓解,其中10名(83.3%)不再符合ICD的诊断标准。对于在DA治疗过程中发生ICD的PD患者,停用或显著减少DA暴露,即使被左旋多巴治疗增加所抵消,也与ICD行为的缓解或显著减少相关,且运动症状不会恶化。