Brandvain Yaniv, Wade Michael J
Department of Biology, Indiana University - Bloomington, IN, USA.
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Oct 25;7:203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-203.
Although selection favors exploitative competition within groups, a group of hypercompetitive individuals may be less productive than a cooperative group. When competition is costly for group fitness, among-group selection can favor groups with 'policing' individuals who reduce within-group competition at a cost to their own fitness, or groups of individuals who restrain their competitive intensity ('self policing'). We examine these possibilities in a series of explicit population-genetic models.
By comparing results from models of half and full sib structured populations, we find that increased relatedness increases the strength of among-group selection against competition genotypes, and increases the strength of among group selection favoring policing genotypes. However, the strength of selection favoring costly policing behavior also increases with increased levels of competition. When levels of competition and policing feedback on one another, groups with lower levels of relatedness can favor higher levels of costly policing.
The result of the joint selection on policing and competition leads to results different from those based on the evolution of policing alone. Our model makes 'long term' predictions equivalent to those of optimization models, but we also show the existence of protected polymorphisms of police and civilians, as well as competitors and non-competitors.
尽管选择有利于群体内部的剥削性竞争,但一群极具竞争力的个体的生产力可能低于一个合作性群体。当竞争对群体适应性造成代价时,群体间选择可能有利于拥有“监管”个体的群体,这些个体以自身适应性为代价减少群体内部竞争,或者有利于那些抑制自身竞争强度的个体群体(“自我监管”)。我们在一系列明确的群体遗传模型中研究了这些可能性。
通过比较半同胞和全同胞结构化群体模型的结果,我们发现亲缘关系的增加会增强群体间针对竞争基因型的选择强度,并增加群体间有利于监管基因型的选择强度。然而,有利于代价高昂的监管行为的选择强度也会随着竞争水平的提高而增加。当竞争水平和监管相互反馈时,亲缘关系较低的群体可能有利于更高水平的代价高昂的监管。
对监管和竞争的联合选择结果与仅基于监管进化的结果不同。我们的模型做出的“长期”预测与优化模型的预测相当,但我们也展示了监管者与非监管者以及竞争者与非竞争者的受保护多态性的存在。