Knight Andrew
Animal Consultants International, London, United Kingdom.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2007;10(4):281-308. doi: 10.1080/10888700701555501.
Biomedical research on captive chimpanzees incurs substantial nonhuman animal welfare, ethical, and financial costs that advocates claim resultin substantial advancements in biomedical knowledge. However, demonstrating minimal contribution toward the advancement of biomedical knowledge generally, subsequent papers did not cite 49.5% (47/95), of 95 experiments randomly selected from a population of 749 published worldwide between 1995 and 2004. Only 14.7% (14/95) were cited by 27 papers that abstracts indicated described well-developed methods for combating human diseases. However, detailed examination of these medical papers revealed that in vitrostudies, human clinical and epidemiological studies, molecular assays and methods, and genomic studies contributed most to their development. No chimpanzee study made an essential contribution, or, in most cases, a significant contribution of any kind, to the development of the medical method described. The approval of these experiments indicates a failure of the ethics committee system. The demonstrable lack of benefit of most chimpanzee experimentation and its profound animal welfare and bioethical costs indicate that a ban is warranted in those remaining countries - notably the United States - that continue to conduct it.
对圈养黑猩猩进行的生物医学研究产生了巨大的非人类动物福利、伦理和经济成本,倡导者声称这带来了生物医学知识的重大进步。然而,总体而言,在对生物医学知识进步的贡献极小,随后的论文未引用从1995年至2004年全球发表的749项实验中随机选取的95项实验中的49.5%(47/95)。只有14.7%(14/95)被27篇摘要表明描述了防治人类疾病成熟方法的论文引用。然而,对这些医学论文的详细审查显示,体外研究、人体临床和流行病学研究、分子分析和方法以及基因组研究对其发展贡献最大。没有一项黑猩猩研究对所描述的医学方法的发展做出了至关重要的贡献,或者在大多数情况下,没有做出任何重大贡献。这些实验的获批表明伦理委员会系统存在缺陷。大多数黑猩猩实验明显缺乏益处,以及其巨大的动物福利和生物伦理成本表明,在那些仍在进行此类实验的国家——尤其是美国——有必要实施禁令。