Pols Hans, Oak Stephanie
Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Am J Public Health. 2007 Dec;97(12):2132-42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.090910. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
Involvement in warfare can have dramatic consequences for the mental health and well-being of military personnel. During the 20th century, US military psychiatrists tried to deal with these consequences while contributing to the military goal of preserving manpower and reducing the debilitating impact of psychiatric syndromes by implementing screening programs to detect factors that predispose individuals to mental disorders, providing early intervention strategies for acute war-related syndromes, and treating long-term psychiatric disability after deployment. The success of screening has proven disappointing, the effects of treatment near the front lines are unclear, and the results of treatment for chronic postwar syndromes are mixed. After the Persian Gulf War, a number of military physicians made innovative proposals for a population-based approach, anchored in primary care instead of specialty-based care. This approach appears to hold the most promise for the future.
参与战争会对军事人员的心理健康和福祉产生巨大影响。在20世纪,美国军事精神科医生试图应对这些影响,同时通过实施筛查项目来检测易使个体患精神障碍的因素,为急性战争相关综合征提供早期干预策略,并治疗部署后出现的长期精神残疾,以此为保持兵力和减少精神综合征的衰弱影响这一军事目标做出贡献。筛查的成效令人失望,前线治疗的效果尚不清楚,慢性战后综合征的治疗结果也喜忧参半。海湾战争后,一些军事医生提出了基于初级保健而非专科保健的创新型群体治疗方案。这种方法似乎最具未来前景。