Hyde Jeffrey D, Bader James A, Shugars Daniel A
University of Washington School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, D-569 Health Sciences, Box 357466, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2007 Nov;71(11):1414-9.
Following a preliminary study indicating that at least 10 percent of single-unit crown temporary restorations failed in patients who received treatment by predoctoral students, a comprehensive examination of provisional crown failure was initiated to identify strategies to reduce the failure rate. For all provisionalized, natural tooth, single-unit crown preparations in University of North Carolina School of Dentistry predoctoral clinics for one year (N=1008), we noted tooth type, type of crown, student level, faculty coverage experience, treatment clinic, temporary material and luting agent, and retreatment (failure) of the provisional restoration. For failures, we also noted the stage of crown preparation at failure and the time since initial placement of the temporary. We analyzed these data using simple cross-tabs and logistic regression on need for retreatment (alpha =0.05). The failure rate was 18.75 percent (N=189). The median time to failure was twelve days; the 25(th) and 75(th) percentiles were six and twenty-six days. Significant risk factors, in order of odds ratio estimates, were molar tooth, second- or third-year student, and inexperienced faculty. Most provisional failures occurred during the final preparation phase of treatment. Provisional restoration failure is more frequent than was initially suspected from preliminary studies. Strategies for institutional intervention to reduce provisional restoration failure include greater attention to evaluating provisional crowns placed by inexperienced students (sophomores and juniors) and placing more emphasis on the retentiveness of provisional restorations reused following the final impression. Review of provisional evaluation procedures is also indicated for faculty who do not routinely supervise these procedures.
一项初步研究表明,在接受博士前学生治疗的患者中,至少10%的单单位冠临时修复体失败,之后便启动了对临时冠失败情况的全面检查,以确定降低失败率的策略。对于北卡罗来纳大学牙科学院博士前诊所一年中所有临时修复的天然牙单单位冠预备(N = 1008),我们记录了牙齿类型、冠的类型、学生水平、教员覆盖经验、治疗诊所、临时材料和粘结剂,以及临时修复体的再治疗(失败)情况。对于失败的病例,我们还记录了失败时冠预备的阶段以及自临时修复体初次放置后的时间。我们使用简单的交叉表和逻辑回归分析这些数据,以确定再治疗的必要性(α = 0.05)。失败率为18.75%(N = 189)。失败的中位时间为12天;第25和第75百分位数分别为6天和26天。按优势比估计顺序排列的显著风险因素为磨牙、二年级或三年级学生以及经验不足的教员。大多数临时修复失败发生在治疗的最终预备阶段。临时修复体失败比初步研究所怀疑的更为频繁。机构干预以降低临时修复体失败的策略包括更加关注评估由经验不足的学生(大二和大三学生)放置的临时冠,并更加重视在取最终印模后重新使用的临时修复体的固位力。对于不经常监督这些程序的教员,也建议审查临时评估程序。