Carey Chris, Din Nick Del, Lamb Jessica, Wright Hazel, Robb Nigel D, Abuzar Menaka
School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast 4215, Australia.
Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
Dent J (Basel). 2021 May 28;9(6):60. doi: 10.3390/dj9060060.
The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the survival rate of single-unit porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) and metal crowns placed by dental students at an Australian university undergraduate dental clinic over a five-year period. Complications and the incidences of crown failures were recorded. Clinical records pertaining to single-unit PFM and metal crowns inserted over a five-year period were reviewed, including patient-related, tooth-related, and procedural factors for each crown. Crowns were evaluated as surviving, surviving with complications, or failed. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis was used to estimate survival rate., This study is based on a sample of 232 (78.4%) PFM crowns and 64 (21.6%) metal crowns inserted between 2014 and 2018. Cumulatively, 224 (75.7%) were surviving, 48 (16.2%) were surviving but previously had complications, and 24 (8.1%) failed. The 5-year cumulative survival rate of all PFM and metal crowns was 83.9% (0.839 ± 0.038, Kaplan-Meier). The average survival time for all crowns was 4.432 ± 0.089 years. Comparatively, PFM crowns had a higher survival rate at 1 year (0.972 ± 0.010) and 2 years (0.919 ± 0.017), compared to metal crowns at 1 year (0.964 ± 0.011) and 2 years (0.894± 0.018). The survival rate of metal crowns remained constant from 2 years to 4 years and thereafter, whereas there was a continued decline in the survival rate of PFM crowns to 83.2% (0.832 ± 0.038) at 4 years and thereafter. Crowns placed on premolars had the highest cumulative survival rate whereas those placed on molars exhibited the lowest survival rate for the duration of the study period. Despite single-unit PFM crowns having a higher 1- and 2-year survival rate compared to metal crowns, metal crowns had a higher survival rate at 4 years and thereafter. Survival rates are comparable to previous studies.
这项回顾性研究的目的是确定澳大利亚一所大学本科牙科诊所的牙科学生在五年时间里所放置的单单位烤瓷熔附金属(PFM)冠和金属冠的存活率。记录了并发症和冠失败的发生率。回顾了与五年期间插入的单单位PFM冠和金属冠相关的临床记录,包括每个冠的患者相关、牙齿相关和操作因素。冠被评估为存活、有并发症存活或失败。采用Kaplan-Meier统计分析来估计存活率。本研究基于2014年至2018年间插入的232个(78.4%)PFM冠和64个(21.6%)金属冠的样本。累计有224个(75.7%)存活,48个(16.2%)存活但之前有并发症,24个(8.1%)失败。所有PFM冠和金属冠的5年累计存活率为83.9%(0.839±0.038,Kaplan-Meier)。所有冠的平均存活时间为4.432±0.089年。相比之下,PFM冠在1年(0.972±0.010)和2年(0.919±0.017)时的存活率高于金属冠在1年(0.964±0.011)和2年(0.894±0.018)时的存活率。金属冠的存活率从2年到4年及以后保持不变,而PFM冠的存活率持续下降,在4年及以后降至83.2%(0.832±0.038)。在研究期间,放置在前磨牙上的冠累计存活率最高,而放置在磨牙上的冠存活率最低。尽管单单位PFM冠在1年和2年时的存活率高于金属冠,但金属冠在4年及以后的存活率更高。存活率与先前的研究相当。