Suppr超能文献

观点:学习职业素养:来自实践一线的视角

Viewpoint: learning professionalism: a view from the trenches.

作者信息

Brainard Andrew H, Brislen Heather C

机构信息

University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2007 Nov;82(11):1010-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000285343.95826.94.

Abstract

The authors, medical students immersed in learning professionalism, observe that most of the professionalism literature misses the mark. Their views on professionalism education, although not the result of qualitative research, were gained from four years of conversations with students from a dozen medical schools, plus online student discussions, focus groups, and meetings with supervisors from five schools. The authors propose that the chief barrier to medical professionalism education is unprofessional conduct by medical educators, which is protected by an established hierarchy of academic authority. Students feel no such protection, and the current structure of professionalism education and evaluation does more to harm students' virtue, confidence, and ethics than is generally acknowledged. The authors maintain that deficiencies in the learning environment, combined with the subjective nature of professionalism evaluation, can leave students feeling persecuted, unfairly judged, and genuinely and tragically confused. They recommend that administrators, medical educators, residents, and students alike must show a personal commitment to the explicit professionalism curriculum and address the hidden curriculum openly and proactively. Educators must assure transparency in the academic process, treat students respectfully, and demonstrate their own professional and ethical behavior. Students overwhelmingly desire to become professional, proficient, and caring physicians. They seek professional instruction, good role models, and fair evaluation. Students struggle profoundly to understand the disconnect between the explicit professional values they are taught and the implicit values of the hidden curriculum. Evaluation of professionalism, when practiced in an often unprofessional learning environment, invites conflict and compromise by students that would otherwise tend naturally toward avowed professional virtues.

摘要

这些作者都是专注于学习职业素养的医学生,他们发现大多数关于职业素养的文献都未切中要害。他们对于职业素养教育的观点,虽不是定性研究的结果,但却是基于与来自十几所医学院校的学生进行的四年交流,以及线上学生讨论、焦点小组讨论,还有与五所学校的导师的会面而得出的。作者们提出,医学职业素养教育的主要障碍是医学教育工作者的不专业行为,而这种行为受到既定学术权威等级制度的庇护。学生却没有这样的庇护,而且当前职业素养教育与评估的结构对学生品德、信心和道德的损害比普遍认知的要大。作者们坚持认为,学习环境的缺陷,再加上职业素养评估的主观性,会让学生感到受迫害、被不公平评判,以及真正地陷入悲惨的困惑之中。他们建议管理人员、医学教育工作者、住院医师和学生都必须对明确的职业素养课程表现出个人承诺,并公开且积极地应对隐性课程。教育工作者必须确保学术过程的透明度,尊重学生,并展现出他们自己的专业和道德行为。绝大多数学生都渴望成为专业、熟练且有爱心的医生。他们寻求专业指导、好的榜样和公平的评估。学生们深感困惑,难以理解他们所学的明确的职业价值观与隐性课程的隐性价值观之间的脱节。在一个往往不专业的学习环境中进行职业素养评估,会引发学生之间的冲突和妥协,而这些冲突和妥协原本自然会趋向于公认的职业美德。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验