Leisey Monica R, Shipman Jean P
VCU Libraries, Virginia Commonwealth University, 509 North Twelfth Street, P.O. Box 980582, Richmond, VA 23298-0582, USA.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Oct;95(4):435-8. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.435.
The aim of this project was to identify and compare physician-perceived versus patient-experienced barriers to filling information prescriptions.
Physicians participated in a focus group designed to identify any issues linked to the implementation of the project. Telephone interviews were conducted with patients to gather details of the challenges encountered as well as to collect general health information-seeking practices.
Although physicians identified several obstacles patients may encounter, it was not possible to identify patient barriers as no patient indicated having received an information prescription. In the focus group, physicians reported not using the term "information prescription," thus undermining one of the intrinsic tenets of the project.
Although designed with the physicians' input, the study results demonstrated a disconnect in the information prescription process. The addition of intervention fidelity measures may have ensured a more positive outcome.
本项目旨在识别并比较医生所认知的与患者所经历的在执行信息处方时遇到的障碍。
医生参加了一个焦点小组，旨在识别与项目实施相关的任何问题。对患者进行了电话访谈，以收集所遇到挑战的详细信息，并收集一般的健康信息寻求行为。
尽管医生识别出了患者可能遇到的几个障碍，但由于没有患者表示收到过信息处方，所以无法识别出患者方面的障碍。在焦点小组中，医生报告未使用“信息处方”这一术语，从而破坏了项目的一个内在原则。
尽管该研究是在医生的参与下设计的，但研究结果表明信息处方过程中存在脱节。增加干预保真度措施可能会确保取得更积极的结果。
