Suppr超能文献

社区护理的优先级评定

Priority rating for community care.

作者信息

Stevermuer Tara L, Owen Alan, Williams Kathryn, Masso Malcolm

机构信息

Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong, Building 29, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2007 Nov;31(4):592-602. doi: 10.1071/ah070592.

Abstract

This paper, which is an additional nosokinetics paper to accompany those presented in Aust Health Rev 31(1), reports on priority rating through a standardised community care assessment system, based on screening for functional abilities and incorporating additional indicators of need and risk. Routinely collected measures used to generate a priority rating have proven useful in clinical decision making and active demand management at the service entry point. Priority rating is a step towards a more equitable and efficient assessment system. Three examples of priority rating systems are described. The first is a generalist application now implemented in routine practice across multiple service types in the Queensland community care and community health system. The second, narrower in scope, was designed for the NSW Home Care Service, and is also being routinely collected. The third was pilot tested in a state-wide program to supply aids and appliances to disabled people and introduced the additional concept of "capacity to benefit". The case studies show how a technical and data-driven approach can be useful in guiding policy in a complex health care sector.

摘要

本文是一篇补充性的疾病动态学论文,与发表在《澳大利亚健康评论》31(1)上的论文一同呈现,报告了通过标准化社区护理评估系统进行的优先级评定,该系统基于功能能力筛查,并纳入了需求和风险的其他指标。用于生成优先级评定的常规收集措施已被证明在服务入口点的临床决策和主动需求管理中很有用。优先级评定是迈向更公平、高效评估系统的一步。文中描述了三个优先级评定系统的示例。第一个是通才应用,目前已在昆士兰社区护理和社区卫生系统的多种服务类型的常规实践中实施。第二个范围较窄,是为新南威尔士州家庭护理服务设计的,也在进行常规收集。第三个在一个全州范围内为残疾人提供辅助器具和设备的项目中进行了试点测试,并引入了“受益能力”这一额外概念。案例研究表明,技术和数据驱动的方法在复杂的医疗保健领域指导政策方面是如何有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验