Suppr超能文献

拓展按绩效付费议程,第1部分:医疗保险如何改善患者决策并减少不必要的医疗服务。

Extending the P4P agenda, part 1: how Medicare can improve patient decision making and reduce unnecessary care.

作者信息

Wennberg John E, O'Connor Annette M, Collins E Dale, Weinstein James N

机构信息

Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Nov-Dec;26(6):1564-74. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1564.

Abstract

The decision to undergo many discretionary medical treatments should be based on informed patient choice. Shared decision making is an effective strategy for achieving this goal. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) should extend its pay-for-performance (P4P) agenda to assure that all Americans have access to a certified shared decision-making process. This paper outlines a strategy to achieve informed patient choice as the standard of practice for preference-sensitive care.

摘要

接受许多选择性医疗治疗的决定应基于患者的知情选择。共同决策是实现这一目标的有效策略。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)应扩展其按绩效付费(P4P)议程,以确保所有美国人都能获得经过认证的共同决策流程。本文概述了一种策略,以实现患者知情选择,作为偏好敏感型医疗的实践标准。

引用本文的文献

3
Cost-effectiveness of Compression Therapy With Early Endovenous Ablation in Venous Ulceration for a Medicare Population.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248152. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48152.
4
Shared Clinical Decision-Making Recommendations for Adult Immunization: What Do Physicians Think?
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2283-2291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06456-z. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Can electronic assessment tools improve the process of shared decision-making? A systematic review.
Health Inf Manag. 2023 May;52(2):72-86. doi: 10.1177/1833358320954385. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
8
Decision making in advanced heart failure: bench, bedside, practice, and policy.
Heart Fail Rev. 2017 Sep;22(5):559-564. doi: 10.1007/s10741-017-9631-6.
9
Accounting for Patient Preferences Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment in Evaluations of Medical Effectiveness and Quality.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 15;196(8):958-963. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0165CP.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):716-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.
3
Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.
BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
5
Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR54-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.54.
6
Trends and geographic variations in major surgery for degenerative diseases of the hip, knee, and spine.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR81-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.81.
7
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.
8
Geography and the debate over Medicare reform.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W96-114. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w2.96.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验