Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2283-2291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06456-z. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
In 2019, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) incorporated the terminology "shared clinical decision-making" (SDM) into recommendations for two adult vaccines.
To assess among general internal medicine physicians (GIMs) and family physicians (FPs) nationally (1) attitudes about and experience with ACIP SDM recommendations, (2) knowledge of insurance reimbursement for vaccines with SDM recommendations, (3) how SDM recommendations are incorporated into vaccine forecasting software, and (4) physician and practice characteristics associated with not knowing how to implement SDM.
Survey conducted in October 2019-January 2020 by mail or internet based on preference.
Networks of GIMs and FPs recruited from American College of Physicians (ACP) and American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) who practice ≥ 50% in primary care. Post-stratification quota sampling performed to ensure networks similar to ACP and AAFP memberships.
Responses on 4-point Likert scales (attitudes/experiences), true/false options (knowledge), and categorical response options (forecasting). Multivariable modeling with outcome of "not knowing how to implement SDM" conducted.
Response rate was 64% (617/968). Most physicians strongly/somewhat agreed SDM requires more time than routine recommendations (90%FP; 95%GIM, p = 0.02) and that they need specific talking points to guide SDM discussions (79%FP; 84%GIM, p = NS). There was both support for SDM recommendations for certain vaccines (81%FP; 75%GIM, p = 0.06) and agreement that SDM creates confusion (64%FP; 76%GIM, p = 0.001). Only 41%FP and 43%GIM knew vaccines recommended for SDM would be covered by most health insurance. Overall, 38% reported SDM recommendations are displayed as "recommended" and 23% that they did not result in any recommendation in forecasting software. In adjusted multivariable models, GIMs [risk ratio 1.44 (1.15-1.81)] and females [1.28 (1.02-1.60)] were significantly associated with not knowing how to implement SDM recommendations CONCLUSIONS: To be successful in a primary care setting, SDM for adult vaccination will require thoughtful implementation with decision-making support for patients and physicians.
2019 年,免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)在两项成人疫苗的建议中纳入了“共同临床决策”(SDM)这一术语。
在全国范围内,评估普通内科医师(GIM)和家庭医师(FP)(1)对 ACIP SDM 建议的态度和经验,(2)对具有 SDM 建议的疫苗保险报销的了解,(3)SDM 建议如何纳入疫苗预测软件,以及(4)与不知道如何实施 SDM 相关的医师和实践特征。
2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 1 月,通过邮件或互联网进行的基于偏好的调查。
从美国医师学院(ACP)和美国家庭医师学会(AAFP)招募的从事≥50%初级保健的 GIM 和 FP 网络。进行了事后分层配额抽样,以确保网络与 ACP 和 AAFP 成员相似。
对 4 点李克特量表(态度/经验)、真/假选项(知识)和分类响应选项(预测)进行了回答。对“不知道如何实施 SDM”的结果进行了多变量建模。
回复率为 64%(617/968)。大多数医生强烈/有些同意 SDM 需要比常规建议更多的时间(90%FP;95%GIM,p=0.02),并且他们需要具体的谈话要点来指导 SDM 讨论(79%FP;84%GIM,p=NS)。对于某些疫苗的 SDM 建议,既有支持(81%FP;75%GIM,p=0.06),也有同意 SDM 会造成混乱的意见(64%FP;76%GIM,p=0.001)。只有 41%的 FP 和 43%的 GIM 知道推荐用于 SDM 的疫苗将由大多数健康保险覆盖。总的来说,38%的人报告 SDM 建议显示为“推荐”,23%的人报告说它们在预测软件中没有导致任何建议。在调整后的多变量模型中,GIM [风险比 1.44(1.15-1.81)]和女性 [1.28(1.02-1.60)]与不知道如何实施 SDM 建议显著相关。
为了在初级保健环境中取得成功,成人疫苗接种的 SDM 需要有患者和医生决策支持的深思熟虑的实施。