Biddiss Elaine A, Chau Tom T
Bloorview Research Institute, Toronto, and Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007 Sep;31(3):236-57. doi: 10.1080/03093640600994581.
This review presents an analytical and comparative survey of upper limb prosthesis acceptance and abandonment as documented over the past 25 years, detailing areas of consumer dissatisfaction and ongoing technological advancements. English-language articles were identified in a search of Ovid, PubMed, and ISI Web of Science (1980 until February 2006) for key words upper limb and prosthesis. Articles focused on upper limb prostheses and addressing: (i) Factors associated with abandonment; (ii) Rejection rates; (iii) Functional analyses and patterns of wear; and (iv) Consumer satisfaction, were extracted with the exclusion of those detailing tools for outcome measurement, case studies, and medical procedures. Approximately 200 articles were included in the review process with 40 providing rates of prosthesis rejection. Quantitative measures of population characteristics, study methodology, and prostheses in use were extracted from each article. Mean rejection rates of 45% and 35% were observed in the literature for body-powered and electric prostheses respectively in pediatric populations. Significantly lower rates of rejection for both body-powered (26%) and electric (23%) devices were observed in adult populations while the average incidence of non-wear was similar for pediatric (16%) and adult (20%) populations. Documented rates of rejection exhibit a wide range of variance, possibly due to the heterogeneous samples involved and methodological differences between studies. Future research should comprise of controlled, multifactor studies adopting standardized outcome measures in order to promote comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting prosthesis use and abandonment. An enhanced understanding of these factors is needed to optimize prescription practices, guide design efforts, and satiate demand for evidence-based measures of intervention.
本综述对过去25年记录的上肢假肢接受和弃用情况进行了分析和比较调查,详细说明了消费者不满意的方面以及当前的技术进步。在搜索Ovid、PubMed和ISI科学网(1980年至2006年2月)时,通过关键词“上肢”和“假肢”识别出英文文章。重点关注上肢假肢并涉及以下方面的文章:(i)与弃用相关的因素;(ii)排斥率;(iii)功能分析和使用模式;(iv)消费者满意度,排除了那些详细介绍结果测量工具、案例研究和医疗程序的文章。约200篇文章纳入了综述过程,其中40篇提供了假肢排斥率。从每篇文章中提取了人群特征、研究方法和使用中的假肢的定量测量数据。文献中观察到,儿童群体中,身体驱动假肢和电动假肢的平均排斥率分别为45%和35%。在成人群体中,身体驱动假肢(26%)和电动假肢(23%)的排斥率显著较低,而儿童(16%)和成人(20%)群体中不使用的平均发生率相似。记录的排斥率呈现出广泛的差异,这可能是由于所涉及的样本异质性以及研究之间方法上的差异。未来的研究应包括采用标准化结果测量的对照多因素研究,以促进对影响假肢使用和弃用因素的全面理解。需要更好地理解这些因素,以优化处方实践、指导设计工作并满足对基于证据的干预措施的需求。