Cox J P, O'Brien E, O'Malley K
Blood Pressure Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1991 Dec;9(3):S73-7.
A number of problems relating to clinic measurements of blood pressure may be particularly relevant to elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. First, there are large discrepancies in the blood pressure levels measured by these two techniques in the elderly population. Second, while blood pressure is universally accepted as one of the most important risk factors for the development of cardiovascular morbidity, its predictive value in the individual is relatively poor. Clinic and 24-h ambulatory recordings from 318 patients aged 17-80 years, diagnosed as having isolated systolic hypertension on clinic measurement, were compared with reference values determined from 815 healthy bank employees. In the isolated systolic hypertension group, mean systolic blood pressure by daytime ambulatory measurement was 27 mmHg lower than that recorded in the clinic, while diastolic pressure was similar (151 +/- 17/87 +/- 11 versus 178 +/- 28/84 +/- 9 mmHg). This discrepancy was greater in women than men, increased slightly but significantly with age (r = 0.12, P less than 0.05) and raised the crucial question as to which of the two measurements might best predict prognosis in this population. In a further study of the association between electrocardiographic (ECG) voltages and blood pressure measured in the clinic and by ambulatory monitoring in 216 patients with isolated systolic hypertension, the sum of SV1 + RV5 and the sum of SV1 + RV6 were significantly and positively related to systolic pressure both in the clinic and with daytime and night-time ambulatory measurement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
一些与血压临床测量有关的问题可能与老年单纯收缩期高血压患者特别相关。首先,在老年人群中,这两种测量技术所测血压水平存在很大差异。其次,虽然血压被公认为是心血管疾病发生的最重要危险因素之一,但其在个体中的预测价值相对较差。对318例年龄在17 - 80岁、临床测量诊断为单纯收缩期高血压的患者进行了临床和24小时动态血压记录,并与815名健康银行员工的参考值进行比较。在单纯收缩期高血压组中,日间动态测量的平均收缩压比临床测量值低27 mmHg,而舒张压相似(分别为151±17/87±11 mmHg和178±28/84±9 mmHg)。这种差异在女性中比男性更大,随年龄略有增加但有显著差异(r = 0.12,P < 0.05),这就提出了一个关键问题:这两种测量方法中哪一种最能预测该人群的预后。在另一项对216例单纯收缩期高血压患者进行的心电图(ECG)电压与临床及动态监测所测血压之间关联的研究中,SV1 + RV5之和以及SV1 + RV6之和与临床、日间和夜间动态测量的收缩压均呈显著正相关。(摘要截断于250字)