Woodward William R, Hetley Richard S
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Mar;41(1):97-105; discussion 114-9. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9000-4.
Miki Takasuna describes knowledge transfer between elite communities of scientists, a process by which ideas become structurally transformed in the host culture. By contrast, a process that we have termed knowledge transfer by deelitization occurs when (a) participatory action researchers work with a community to identify a problem involving oppression or exploitation. Then (b) community members suggest solutions and acquire the tools of analysis and action to pursue social actions. (c) Disadvantaged persons thereby become more aware of their own abilities and resources, and persons with special expertise become more effective. (d) Rather than detachment and value neutrality, this joint process involves advocacy and structural transformation. In the examples of participatory action research documented here, Third World social scientists collaborated with indigenous populations to solve problems of literacy, community-building, land ownership, and political voice. Western social scientists, inspired by these non-Western scientists, then joined in promoting PAR both in the Third World and in Europe and the Americas, e.g., adapting it for solving problems of people with disabilities or disenfranchised women. Emancipatory goals such as these may even help North American psychologists to break free of some methodological chains and to bring about social and political change.
高砂美纪描述了精英科学家群体之间的知识转移,这是一个思想在接受文化中发生结构转变的过程。相比之下,当(a)参与式行动研究人员与一个社区合作,确定一个涉及压迫或剥削的问题时,就会出现我们所称的去精英化知识转移过程。然后(b)社区成员提出解决方案,并获得分析和行动工具以开展社会行动。(c)弱势群体因此更加了解自己的能力和资源,而具有特殊专业知识的人则变得更有成效。(d)这个联合过程不是超脱和价值中立,而是涉及倡导和结构转变。在这里记录的参与式行动研究实例中,第三世界社会科学家与本土居民合作,解决识字、社区建设、土地所有权和政治发言权等问题。受这些非西方科学家的启发,西方社会科学家随后也在第三世界以及欧洲和美洲参与推动参与式行动研究,例如,将其应用于解决残疾人或被剥夺权利妇女的问题。诸如此类的解放性目标甚至可能帮助北美心理学家摆脱一些方法论束缚,实现社会和政治变革。