McCartt Anne T, Blackman Kenneth, Voas Robert B
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1005 North Glebe Road, Arlington, VA 22201, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2007 Dec;8(4):339-45. doi: 10.1080/15389580701477267.
Zero tolerance (ZT) laws have been effective in reducing alcohol-related crashes among underage drivers. However, enforcement in some states has not been rigorous, and ZT offenses may not be viewed as serious offenses. On July 1, 1994, the state of Washington implemented a ZT law that allowed police to request a test for alcohol on suspicion of either a ZT or driving-under-the-influence (DUI) offense. The present study examined effects of the ZT law on arrests and case dispositions among underage offenders as a function of blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and post-law patterns of recidivism.
Times-series analyses examined the effects of the ZT law on trends in arrests of underage drivers between 1991 and 1999. Based on arrest records matched with driver's license records, the effects of the law on dispositions of alcohol-related offenses among underage drivers were examined, and rates of recidivism among underage offenders were examined for the period following the ZT law.
There was a substantial increase in arrests of underage drivers beginning immediately after implementation of the ZT law, especially among drivers with low BACs. The types of court or administrative dispositions received by underage offenders changed markedly after the ZT law was implemented. Underage offenders with lower BACs became far more likely to receive alcohol-related convictions and/or license suspensions. However, the percentage of underage offenders with higher BACs receiving DUI convictions declined as some of these offenders received the lesser ZT disposition. After the ZT law, underage offenders with BACs of 0.10 g/dL or higher were more likely to recidivate than those with lower BACs, but appreciable proportions of drivers were re-arrested for another alcohol offense, whatever the BAC and however they were penalized.
Implementation of Washington's law indicates that a ZT law can increase the likelihood that an underage person will be sanctioned for drinking and driving. However, recidivism remains an issue as more than one in four underage drivers arrested with low BACs subsequently were re-arrested.
零容忍(ZT)法律在减少未成年驾驶员与酒精相关的撞车事故方面已见成效。然而,一些州的执法并不严格,且ZT违法行为可能未被视为严重罪行。1994年7月1日,华盛顿州实施了一项ZT法律,允许警方在怀疑存在ZT或酒后驾车(DUI)违法行为时要求对酒精进行检测。本研究考察了ZT法律对未成年违法者逮捕情况和案件处置的影响,以及其与血液酒精浓度(BAC)和法律实施后再犯模式的关系。
时间序列分析考察了ZT法律对1991年至1999年间未成年驾驶员逮捕趋势的影响。基于与驾照记录匹配的逮捕记录,考察了该法律对未成年驾驶员酒精相关违法行为处置的影响,并对ZT法律实施后的未成年违法者再犯率进行了考察。
在ZT法律实施后,未成年驾驶员的逮捕人数立即大幅增加,尤其是BAC较低的驾驶员。ZT法律实施后,未成年违法者所接受的法庭或行政处置类型发生了显著变化。BAC较低的未成年违法者更有可能被判定与酒精相关的罪行和/或被吊销驾照。然而,BAC较高的未成年违法者中因DUI被定罪的比例有所下降,因为其中一些违法者受到了较轻的ZT处置。ZT法律实施后,BAC为0.10 g/dL或更高的未成年违法者比BAC较低的违法者更有可能再次犯罪,但无论BAC如何以及受到何种处罚,仍有相当比例的驾驶员因再次饮酒违法而被重新逮捕。
华盛顿州法律的实施表明,ZT法律可以增加对未成年酒后驾车者进行制裁的可能性。然而,再犯问题依然存在,因为四分之一以上BAC较低而被捕的未成年驾驶员随后再次被捕。