Peck Stephen C
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1290, USA.
J Pers. 2007 Dec;75(6):1127-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00470.x.
Terminological ambiguity and inattention to personal and contextual multilevel systems undermine personality, self, and identity theories. Hierarchical and heterarchical systems theories are used to describe contents and processes existing within and across three interrelated multilevel systems: levels of organization, representation, and integration. Materially nested levels of organization are used to distinguish persons from contexts and personal from social identity. Functionally nested levels of representation are used to distinguish personal identity from the sense of identity and symbolic (belief) from iconic (schema) systems. Levels of integration are hypothesized to unfold separately but interdependently across levels of representation. Multilevel system configurations clarify alternative conceptualizations of traits and contextualized identity. Methodological implications for measurement and analysis (e.g., integrating variable- and pattern-centered methods) are briefly described.
术语的模糊性以及对个人和情境多层次系统的忽视破坏了人格、自我和身份理论。层次系统理论和异层次系统理论被用来描述存在于三个相互关联的多层次系统内部及之间的内容和过程:组织层次、表征层次和整合层次。物质上嵌套的组织层次用于区分人与情境以及个人身份与社会身份。功能上嵌套的表征层次用于区分个人身份与身份感,以及符号(信念)系统与图式(模式)系统。整合层次被假定为在表征层次中分别但相互依存地展开。多层次系统配置阐明了特质和情境化身份的替代概念。简要描述了测量和分析的方法学意义(例如,整合以变量为中心和以模式为中心的方法)。