Roncoroni A J, Pereyra J C, Valentini R
Sección de Infectología, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC) Norberto Quirno, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1991 Aug-Sep;9(7):416-9.
Central venous blood cultures, obtained through catheters have been used for diagnosis of tip infections. We prospectively studied in a consecutive way two blood culture techniques. In a group of 23 cases, the first 5 ml of catheter solution was discarded, and in the second group of 41 cases the first 10 ml of catheter solution and blood were used. Colony counts for true positive samples were 100 cfu/ml (median value) with a 95% confidence interval = 5-1000 cfu/ml. Test validation showed for all cases, first and second groups respectively: sensitivity 60%, 50% and 62.5%; specificity 91.1%, 100% and 94.7%; positive predictive values 94.1%, 100% and 93.8%; negative predictive values 73.3%, 85% and 64%. This study had a limited utility in the diagnosis of central venous catheter tip infections. Our results show that the most sensitive technique is culture of initial samples obtained through the venous access, and that a cut-off lower than those used in previous studies should be used.
通过导管采集的中心静脉血培养已用于诊断导管尖端感染。我们前瞻性地连续研究了两种血培养技术。在一组23例患者中,丢弃导管内最初的5毫升液体,在另一组41例患者中,使用导管内最初的10毫升液体及血液。真正阳性样本的菌落计数为100 cfu/ml(中位数),95%置信区间为5 - 1000 cfu/ml。测试验证显示,所有病例中,第一组和第二组的敏感性分别为60%、50%和62.5%;特异性分别为91.1%、100%和94.7%;阳性预测值分别为94.1%、100%和93.8%;阴性预测值分别为73.3%、85%和64%。这项研究在诊断中心静脉导管尖端感染方面的效用有限。我们的结果表明,最敏感的技术是培养通过静脉通路采集的初始样本,并且应采用低于以往研究中使用的临界值。