Suppr超能文献

老年患者背侧成角、不稳定桡骨远端骨折临床及影像学结果的比较研究:病灶内穿针与掌侧锁定钢板固定的对比

A comparative study of clinical and radiological outcomes of dorsally angulated, unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients: intrafocal pinning versus volar locking plating.

作者信息

Oshige Toshihisa, Sakai Akinori, Zenke Yukichi, Moritani Shiro, Nakamura Toshitaka

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Nov;32(9):1385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.07.005.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of intrafocal pinning (IFP) and volar locking plating (VLP) of dorsally angulated, unstable distal radius fractures in elderly patients.

METHODS

The subjects were 62 consecutive patients over 60 years of age with dorsally angulated, unstable distal radius fractures treated with IFP or VLP. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at first examination. The range of motion and grip strength were measured at follow-up examinations, and ulnar variance (UV) was measured on radiographs at baseline and follow-up postoperative examinations.

RESULTS

There were no notable differences in gender, age, follow-up period, baseline UV, BMD, and AO classification between IFP and VLP groups. There was no difference between the UV in VLP immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up examination; however, IFP showed a significant loss of reduction as measured by UV. In patients with UV more than 5 mm or BMD less than 70% of young adult mean (YAM) at first examination, UV increased again at the final follow-up examination in IFP, while surgically corrected UV was maintained in VLP, independent of the degree of baseline UV and BMD. VLP resulted in earlier recovery of postoperative range of motion and grip strength compared with IFP. The range of flexion and the grip strength value were significantly larger in VLP at final examination.

CONCLUSIONS

VLP, but not IFP, can maintain surgically corrected UV in distal radius fractures, independent of the degrees of initial UV and BMD. VLP enhances earlier recovery in range of motion and grip strength than IFP.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

摘要

目的

比较老年患者背侧成角、不稳定型桡骨远端骨折采用病灶内穿针固定(IFP)和掌侧锁定钢板固定(VLP)的临床及影像学结果。

方法

研究对象为62例60岁以上背侧成角、不稳定型桡骨远端骨折患者,采用IFP或VLP治疗。首次检查时采用双能X线吸收法测量腰椎骨密度(BMD)。随访时测量活动范围和握力,基线及术后随访时通过X线片测量尺骨变异(UV)。

结果

IFP组和VLP组在性别、年龄、随访时间、基线UV、BMD及AO分型方面无显著差异。VLP术后即刻与末次随访时的UV无差异;然而,通过UV测量,IFP显示复位明显丢失。首次检查时UV大于5 mm或BMD低于青年成人平均值(YAM)的70%的患者,IFP末次随访时UV再次增加,而VLP手术矫正后的UV得以维持,与基线UV和BMD程度无关。与IFP相比,VLP使术后活动范围和握力恢复更早。末次检查时,VLP的屈曲范围和握力值明显更大。

结论

VLP而非IFP能够维持桡骨远端骨折手术矫正后的UV,与初始UV和BMD程度无关。VLP比IFP能促进活动范围和握力更早恢复。

研究类型/证据水平:治疗性II级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验