Johnson C Anderson, Xiao Lin, Palmer Paula, Sun Ping, Wang Qiong, Wei Yonglan, Jia Yong, Grenard Jerry L, Stacy Alan W, Bechara Antoine
Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 91803, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):714-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.012. Epub 2007 Sep 29.
The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that adolescent binge drinkers, but not lighter drinkers, would show signs of impairment on tasks of affective decision-making as measured by the Iowa Gambling Test (IGT), when compared to adolescents who never drank. We tested 207 10th grade adolescents in Chengdu City, China, using two versions of the IGT, the original and a variant, in which the reward/punishment contingencies were reversed. This enables one to distinguish among different possibilities of impaired decision-making, such as insensitivity to long-term consequences, or hypersensitivity to reward. Furthermore, we tested working memory capacity using the Self-ordered Pointing Test (SOPT). Paper and pencil questionnaires were used to assess drinking behaviors and school academic performance. Results indicated that relative to never-drinkers, adolescent binge drinkers, but not other (ever, past 30-day) drinkers, showed significantly lower net scores on the original version of the IGT especially in the latter trials. Furthermore, the profiles of behavioral performance from the original and variant versions of the IGT were consistent with a decision-making impairment attributed to hypersensitivity to reward. In addition, working memory and school academic performance revealed no differences between drinkers (at all levels) and never-drinkers. Logistic regression analysis showed that after controlling for demographic variables, working memory, and school academic performance, the IGT significantly predicted binge-drinking. These findings suggest that a "myopia" for future consequences linked to hypersensitivity to reward is a key characteristic of adolescents with binge-drinking behavior, and that underlying neural mechanisms for this "myopia" for future consequences may serve as a predisposing factor that renders some adolescents more susceptible to future addictive behaviors.
与从不饮酒的青少年相比,青少年暴饮者(而非轻度饮酒者)在艾奥瓦赌博测试(IGT)所衡量的情感决策任务中会表现出受损迹象。我们在中国成都市对207名十年级青少年进行了测试,使用了IGT的两个版本,即原版和一个奖励/惩罚意外情况相反的变体版本。这使得人们能够区分决策受损的不同可能性,比如对长期后果不敏感或对奖励过度敏感。此外,我们使用自定顺序指向测试(SOPT)来测试工作记忆能力。通过纸笔问卷来评估饮酒行为和学校学业成绩。结果表明,相对于从不饮酒者,青少年暴饮者(而非其他饮酒者,包括曾经饮酒者和过去30天内饮酒者)在IGT原版测试中的净得分显著更低,尤其是在后面的试验中。此外,IGT原版和变体版本的行为表现概况与因对奖励过度敏感而导致的决策受损一致。另外,饮酒者(所有水平)和从不饮酒者在工作记忆和学校学业成绩方面没有差异。逻辑回归分析表明,在控制了人口统计学变量、工作记忆和学校学业成绩后,IGT能显著预测暴饮行为。这些发现表明,与对奖励过度敏感相关的对未来后果的“近视”是青少年暴饮行为的一个关键特征,并且这种对未来后果“近视”的潜在神经机制可能是使一些青少年更容易出现未来成瘾行为的一个诱发因素。