Goldberg Ivan, Adena Michael A
Department of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;35(8):700-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01573.x.
Prescribing topical beta-blockers for patients with glaucoma, who are also being treated with systemic beta-blockers, raises efficacy and safety concerns. This potentially inappropriate co-prescribing practice is a Quality Use of Medicine issue. This study aimed to quantify the extent of co-prescribing of topical and systemic beta-blockers in Australian clinical practice.
This is a retrospective analysis of de-identified billing data for supply (surrogate marker for prescribing) of topical and systemic beta-blockers from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (1999-2004) to concessional patients supplied either topical or systemic beta-blockers. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients supplied systemic beta-blockers within the patient population supplied topical beta-blockers. This percentage was calculated for each financial year (July 1999-June 2004), age group (<65 years; 65-74 years; 75-84 years; > or =85 years) and sex.
Approximately 20% of patients supplied topical beta-blockers (representing Australian glaucoma patients) were also supplied systemic beta-blockers, equating to more than 20 000 patients per year. This percentage varied with age, but not with year or sex. The percentage of patients co-supplied topical and systemic beta-blockers was the lowest (13%) for patients <65 years and the highest (23%) for patients 75-84 years.
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme supply data shows that the potentially inappropriate practice of co-prescribing topical and systemic beta-blockers affects more than 20 000 concessional patients in Australia each year, particularly the elderly. This Quality Use of Medicine issue has now been quantified; doctors, pharmacists and patients must be made aware of the reduced efficacy and potential for more side-effects from this co-prescribing practice.
为青光眼患者开具局部用β受体阻滞剂时,若患者同时接受全身性β受体阻滞剂治疗,会引发疗效和安全性方面的担忧。这种潜在的不恰当联合用药做法是合理用药问题。本研究旨在量化澳大利亚临床实践中局部用和全身性β受体阻滞剂联合用药的程度。
这是一项对去识别化计费数据的回顾性分析,这些数据来自药品福利计划(1999 - 2004年)中向接受局部或全身性β受体阻滞剂治疗的特惠患者供应局部用和全身性β受体阻滞剂的情况(供应作为开药的替代指标)。主要结局是在接受局部用β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者群体中接受全身性β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者百分比。针对每个财政年度(1999年7月 - 2004年6月)、年龄组(<65岁;65 - 74岁;75 - 84岁;≥85岁)和性别计算该百分比。
大约20%接受局部用β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者(代表澳大利亚青光眼患者)也接受了全身性β受体阻滞剂治疗,相当于每年超过20000名患者。该百分比随年龄变化,但不随年份或性别变化。同时接受局部用和全身性β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者百分比在<65岁的患者中最低(13%),在75 - 84岁的患者中最高(23%)。
药品福利计划供应数据表明,局部用和全身性β受体阻滞剂联合用药这种潜在的不恰当做法每年影响澳大利亚超过20000名特惠患者,尤其是老年人。这个合理用药问题现已得到量化;必须让医生、药剂师和患者了解这种联合用药做法会降低疗效并增加副作用的可能性。