Challa Prasanna K, Smith Karen M, Conti C Richard
Fellowship in Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 2007 Nov;30(11):558-61. doi: 10.1002/clc.20141.
Evaluation of chest pain accounts for millions of costly Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospital admissions annually. Of these, approximately 10-20% are myocardial infarctions (MI).
Patients with chest pain whose initial electrocardiogram (ECG) is normal do not require hospital admission for evaluation and management of a possible myocardial infarction.
The medical records of a consecutive cohort of 250 patients who presented to the ED with chest pain and were admitted by the ED physician to a cardiology inpatient service of an academic tertiary care medical center were reviewed. Reasons for admission to hospital was to rule out an acute coronary syndrome, specifically, myocardial infarction. The initial ECG of each patient was evaluated for abnormalities and compared with the final diagnosis.
Of the 75 patients presenting with normal ECGs (normal, upright T waves and isoelectric ST segments), 1 (1.3%) was subsequently diagnosed with a myocardial infarction by Troponin I elevation alone. Of the 55 patients presenting with abnormal ECGs but no clear evidence of ischemia [i.e., left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB), left anterior hemiblock (LAH)], 2 (3.6%) were diagnosed with MI. Of the 48 patients presenting with abnormal ECGs questionable for ischemia (nonspecific ST and T wave changes that were not clearly ST segment elevation or depression), 7 (14.6%) were diagnosed with an MI. Of the 72 patients who presented with abnormal ECGs showing ischemia (acute ST segment elevation and/or depression), 39 (54.2%) were shown to have evidence for MI.
Patients who presented with normal ECGs (category 1) were extremely low risk for acute myocardial infarction. Patients with abnormal ECGs but no evidence of definite ischemia (category 2) had a relatively low incidence of MI. Patients with abnormal ECGs questionable for ischemia (category 3) had an intermediate risk of acute myocardial infarction. The majority of patients with abnormal ECGs demonstrating ischemia (category 4) were subsequently shown to evolve an acute myocardial infarction.
Patients with chest pain and initial ECGs with ST segment abnormalities suggestive or diagnostic for ischemia, should be admitted to the hospital for further evaluation and management. Patients with ECGs that do not display acute ST segment changes are at a lower risk for acute myocardial infarction than those with acute ST segment changes and should be admitted on the basis of cardiac risk profile. (i.e., age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, known coronary artery disease, etc.) Patients with normal ECGs (category 1) are at extremely low risk, and it may be acceptable to consider further evaluation on an outpatient basis.
胸痛评估每年导致数百万次昂贵的急诊科就诊和住院治疗。其中,约10%-20%为心肌梗死(MI)。
初始心电图(ECG)正常的胸痛患者无需住院以评估和处理可能的心肌梗死。
回顾了连续250例因胸痛就诊于急诊科并被急诊科医生收治到一所学术性三级医疗中心心脏科住院部的患者的病历。住院原因是排除急性冠状动脉综合征,特别是心肌梗死。评估每位患者的初始心电图有无异常,并与最终诊断进行比较。
在75例初始心电图正常(T波正常直立且ST段等电位)的患者中,仅1例(1.3%)随后仅因肌钙蛋白I升高被诊断为心肌梗死。在55例心电图异常但无明确缺血证据[即左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)、右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)、左前分支阻滞(LAH)]的患者中,2例(3.6%)被诊断为心肌梗死。在48例心电图异常但缺血情况可疑(非特异性ST段和T波改变,未明确为ST段抬高或压低)的患者中,7例(14.6%)被诊断为心肌梗死。在72例心电图显示缺血(急性ST段抬高和/或压低)的患者中,39例(54.2%)有心肌梗死证据。
初始心电图正常(第1类)的患者发生急性心肌梗死的风险极低。心电图异常但无明确缺血证据(第2类)的患者心肌梗死发生率相对较低。心电图异常但缺血情况可疑(第3类)的患者有急性心肌梗死的中度风险。大多数心电图显示缺血(第4类)的患者随后被证实发生了急性心肌梗死。
胸痛且初始心电图有提示或诊断缺血的ST段异常的患者,应住院进一步评估和处理。心电图未显示急性ST段改变的患者发生急性心肌梗死的风险低于有急性ST段改变的患者,应根据心脏风险状况(即年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟、已知冠状动脉疾病等)决定是否住院。初始心电图正常(第1类)的患者风险极低,考虑门诊进一步评估可能是可以接受的。