Lee T H, Cook E F, Weisberg M, Sargent R K, Wilson C, Goldman L
Arch Intern Med. 1985 Jan;145(1):65-9.
Clinical and laboratory data from 596 patients who came to an emergency room complaining of chest pain indicated that no single variable could identify low-risk patients as well as a normal ECG. A combination of three variables--sharp or stabbing pain, no history of angina or myocardial infarction, and pain with pleuritic or positional components or pain that was reproduced by palpation of the chest wall--defined a very-low-risk group in which ECGs did not add accuracy to the evaluation and were potentially misleading; however, only 48 patients (8%) fell into this category. Standard cardiac enzyme levels were of almost no use as an emergency room indicator of myocardial infarction. These findings emphasize the difficulty of identifying patients at low risk for myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the emergency room without consideration of many factors from the history, the physical examination, and the ECG.
596名因胸痛前往急诊室就诊患者的临床和实验室数据表明,没有任何单一变量能像正常心电图那样准确识别低风险患者。三个变量的组合——刺痛或戳痛、无心绞痛或心肌梗死病史、伴有胸膜炎性或体位性成分的疼痛或胸壁触诊可再现的疼痛——定义了一个极低风险组,在该组中,心电图对评估并无额外帮助,甚至可能产生误导;然而,仅有48名患者(8%)属于这一类别。标准心肌酶水平几乎无法作为急诊室心肌梗死的指标。这些发现强调了在急诊室不考虑病史、体格检查和心电图等诸多因素来识别心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛低风险患者的困难。