Anderson Michael A, Songer J Glenn
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Apr 1;128(1-2):204-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.022. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in neonatal pigs is accomplished, in part, by detection of toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB) in feces or colonic contents. Samples (n=115) were tested simultaneously with two toxin assays (Clostridium difficile Tox A/B II, TechLab, Blacksburg, VA; Gastro-tect Clostridium difficile Toxin A+B, Medical Chemical Corporation). Previous comparison of the Tox A/B II assay to the reference method (toxicity in CHO cell monolayers) revealed an overall correlation of 88%, with 91% sensitivity and 86% specificity, a positive predictive value of 86 and a negative predictive value of 84. In comparing the two EIAs, a group of nine samples were positive in both assays and a group of 92 were negative in both. However, 14 samples positive in the Tox A/B II were negative in the Gastro-tect assay. Thus, in comparison to the Tox A/B II assay, the Gastro-tect assay was 100% specific but only 39% sensitive. Its negative predictive value was 87, but its positive predictive value was 100. Thus, the Tox A/B II kit is apparently superior to the Gastro-tect Toxin A+B test for diagnosis of CDAD in neonatal pigs.
新生仔猪艰难梭菌相关性疾病(CDAD)的诊断部分是通过检测粪便或结肠内容物中的毒素A(TcdA)和毒素B(TcdB)来完成的。对115份样本同时使用两种毒素检测方法进行检测(艰难梭菌毒素A/B II检测试剂盒,TechLab公司,弗吉尼亚州布莱克斯堡;Gastro-tect艰难梭菌毒素A+B检测试剂盒,Medical Chemical Corporation公司)。之前将Tox A/B II检测方法与参考方法(CHO细胞单层毒性检测)进行比较,结果显示总体相关性为88%,灵敏度为91%,特异性为86%,阳性预测值为86,阴性预测值为84。在比较这两种酶联免疫吸附测定(EIA)时,有9份样本在两种检测中均呈阳性,92份样本在两种检测中均呈阴性。然而,有14份样本在Tox A/B II检测中呈阳性,但在Gastro-tect检测中呈阴性。因此,与Tox A/B II检测方法相比,Gastro-tect检测方法的特异性为100%,但灵敏度仅为39%。其阴性预测值为87,阳性预测值为100。因此,对于新生仔猪CDAD的诊断,Tox A/B II试剂盒显然优于Gastro-tect毒素A+B检测。