• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估基因易感性测试模拟研究中的假设情景方法:一项定量综述。

Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative review.

作者信息

Persky Susan, Kaphingst Kimberly A, Condit Celeste M, McBride Colleen M

机构信息

National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2007 Nov;9(11):727-38. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318159a344.

DOI:10.1097/gim.0b013e318159a344
PMID:18007141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9942866/
Abstract

Hypothetical scenario methodology is commonly employed in the study of genetic susceptibility testing uptake estimation. The methodology, however, has not been rigorously assessed and sizeable gaps exist between estimated and actual uptake for tests that have recently become available. This quantitative review explores the effect of several theoretically based factors on genetic test uptake accuracy among a sample of 38 articles. These factors include verbal immediacy and temporal proximity of test scenarios, method of decision assessment, content of testing detail provided, processing demand required, and study features related to administration and sample. A number of assessed factors influenced uptake accuracy. Among these, temporal proximity of the genetic susceptibility test appeared to be the most consistent. There was also some evidence for effects of verbal immediacy and decision-assessment method on interest in testing. We recommend strategies for increasing accuracy using hypothetical scenario methodology to examine genetic susceptibility test uptake prediction.

摘要

假设情景方法通常用于遗传易感性检测接受度估计的研究中。然而,该方法尚未经过严格评估,对于最近可用的检测,估计接受度与实际接受度之间存在相当大的差距。这一定量综述探讨了38篇文章样本中几个基于理论的因素对基因检测接受度准确性的影响。这些因素包括检测情景的语言即时性和时间接近性、决策评估方法、提供的检测细节内容、所需的处理需求以及与管理和样本相关的研究特征。许多评估因素影响了接受度准确性。其中,遗传易感性检测的时间接近性似乎最为一致。也有一些证据表明语言即时性和决策评估方法对检测兴趣有影响。我们推荐使用假设情景方法提高准确性的策略,以检验遗传易感性检测接受度预测。

相似文献

1
Assessing hypothetical scenario methodology in genetic susceptibility testing analog studies: a quantitative review.评估基因易感性测试模拟研究中的假设情景方法:一项定量综述。
Genet Med. 2007 Nov;9(11):727-38. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e318159a344.
2
BRCAShare-Assessment of an animated digital message for intrafamilial communication of pathogenic variant positive test results: A feasibility study.BRCAShare——一项关于用于家族内致病性变异阳性检测结果沟通的动画数字信息的评估:一项可行性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Apr;32(2):475-485. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1656. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
3
Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review.乳腺癌基因检测的接受率:一项系统综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 May;15(5):840-55. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0002.
4
Genetic testing for heart disease susceptibility: potential impact on motivation to quit smoking.心脏病易感性的基因检测:对戒烟动机的潜在影响。
Clin Genet. 2007 Jun;71(6):501-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00810.x.
5
Genetic testing for late-onset diseases: effect of disease controllability, test predictivity, and gender on the decision to take the test.迟发性疾病的基因检测:疾病可控性、检测预测性及性别对检测决策的影响。
Genet Test. 2007 Summer;11(2):187-92. doi: 10.1089/gte.2006.0509.
6
Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations.女性对乳腺癌易感性基因检测的兴趣可能基于不切实际的期望。
Am J Med Genet. 2001 Mar 1;99(2):99-110. doi: 10.1002/1096-8628(2000)9999:999<00::aid-ajmg1142>3.0.co;2-i.
7
The feasibility of online genetic testing for lung cancer susceptibility: uptake of a web-based protocol and decision outcomes.肺癌易感性在线基因检测的可行性:基于网络方案的采用情况及决策结果。
Genet Med. 2008 Feb;10(2):121-30. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f8e06.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
10
Most Current Smokers Desire Genetic Susceptibility Testing and Genetically-Efficacious Medication.大多数当前吸烟者希望进行遗传易感性测试和基因有效药物治疗。
J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;13(4):430-437. doi: 10.1007/s11481-018-9818-1. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating care and treatment scenarios for measuring decisional conflict regarding future care preferences among older adults.验证老年人未来护理偏好决策冲突的护理和治疗方案。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14010. doi: 10.1111/hex.14010.
2
Perception of genomic newborn screening among peripartum mothers.围产期母亲对基因组新生儿筛查的认知
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Feb;32(2):163-170. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01497-4. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
"I just wanted more": Hereditary cancer syndromes patients' perspectives on the utility of circulating tumour DNA testing for cancer screening.“我只是想要更多”:遗传性癌症综合征患者对循环肿瘤DNA检测用于癌症筛查效用的看法
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Feb;32(2):176-181. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01473-y. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
4
Interest in Cancer Predisposition Testing and Carrier Screening Offered as Part of Routine Healthcare Among an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Young Women.作为常规医疗保健一部分的癌症易感性检测和携带者筛查在不同种族年轻女性样本中的受关注情况。
Front Genet. 2022 Apr 14;13:866062. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866062. eCollection 2022.
5
Public perceptions of predictive testing for rheumatoid arthritis compared to breast cancer and early-onset Alzheimer's disease: a qualitative study.与乳腺癌和早发性阿尔茨海默病相比,公众对类风湿关节炎预测性检测的认知:一项定性研究。
BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Mar 2;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41927-021-00244-w.
6
What would I do? Perspectives on the factors underlying Lynch syndrome genetic testing and results sharing decisions for high-risk colorectal cancer patients.我会怎么做?探讨林奇综合征遗传检测和高危结直肠癌患者检测结果共享决策的潜在因素。
Psychooncology. 2022 Apr;31(4):587-596. doi: 10.1002/pon.5840. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios.新生儿临终决策:希腊医生、助产士和护士在临床场景中的可能行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 9;18(8):3938. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083938.
8
The impact of the number of tests presented and a provider recommendation on decisions about genetic testing for cancer risk.所提供的检测数量及医疗服务提供者的建议对癌症风险基因检测决策的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Feb;104(2):265-275. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.020. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
Investigating the knowledge of and public attitudes towards genetic testing within the Visegrad countries: a cross-sectional study.维谢格拉德集团国家民众对基因检测的认知及公众态度调查:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):1380. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09473-z.
10
Benefits and harms of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk: a cross-sectional study of methods to communicate risk in primary care.选择性雌激素受体调节剂(SERMs)降低乳腺癌风险的获益与危害:初级保健中沟通风险方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Nov 28;69(689):e836-e842. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X706841. Print 2019 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review.乳腺癌基因检测的接受率:一项系统综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 May;15(5):840-55. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0002.
2
Dispositional motivations and genetic risk feedback.性格动机与基因风险反馈。
Addict Behav. 2005 Sep;30(8):1524-34. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.03.002.
3
Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature.癌症易感性基因检测的心理影响:文献综述更新
Psychooncology. 2005 Dec;14(12):1060-74. doi: 10.1002/pon.933.
4
The application of the heuristic-systematic processing model to treatment decision making about prostate cancer.启发式系统加工模型在前列腺癌治疗决策中的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec;24(6):573-83. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04271044.
5
Public interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to heart disease and cancer: a population-based survey in the UK.英国公众对心脏病和癌症易感性基因检测的兴趣:一项基于人群的调查
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):458-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.051.
6
Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: an integrative review.与乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险基因检测相关的心理社会问题:一项综合综述。
Cancer Invest. 2003;21(4):588-623. doi: 10.1081/cnv-120022380.
7
The influence of question wording on assessments of interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk.问题措辞对乳腺癌风险基因检测兴趣评估的影响。
Psychooncology. 2003 Oct-Nov;12(7):720-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.699.
8
Temporal construal.时间构想
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):403-21. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403.
9
Genetic testing: psychological aspects and implications.基因检测:心理层面及影响
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;70(3):784-97. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.3.784.
10
Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population.对初级保健人群进行BRCA1/2检测的关注。
Prev Med. 2002 Jun;34(6):590-5. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2002.1022.