• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The level at which blood pressure should be treated.

作者信息

Swales J D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1991 Dec;5(6):979-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00143523.

DOI:10.1007/BF00143523
PMID:1801896
Abstract

The large multicenter trials of treatment in mild to moderate hypertension have shown unequivocally that the risk of stroke is reversed. The impact of treatment on ischemic heart disease is more debatable. Since there is no discontinuity in the risk of different levels of blood pressure, any advice about the level of pressure to treat must be arbitrary. The British Hypertension Society Guidelines recommend a sustained diastolic pressure of 100 mmHg or more over a 3- to 4-month period. This empirical advice is based upon subgroup analysis of the MRC and Australian Therapeutic Trials that suggests most of the benefit in treating the mildest degrees of hypertension occur in this group of patients. The role of newer classes of agent, such as ACE inhibitors or calcium-channel blockers, cannot be fully assessed in the absence of proper end-point trials. Whilst reasons for using these agents as first-line therapy have been put forward, these remain speculative in the absence of such trials. The much greater cost of newer agents in the context of universally cost-constrained health services also has to be borne in mind before recommending their widespread use as first-line therapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
The level at which blood pressure should be treated.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1991 Dec;5(6):979-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00143523.
2
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Cochrane背景下:儿童高血压的药物干预
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975.
3
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2.
4
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.
5
The 2004 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part II--Therapy.2004年加拿大高血压管理指南:第二部分——治疗
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):41-54.
6
7
8
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
9
The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part 2 - therapy.《2007年加拿大高血压教育计划高血压管理建议:第2部分——治疗》
Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):539-50. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70798-5.
10
The 2005 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part II - therapy.2005年加拿大高血压教育计划关于高血压管理的建议:第二部分——治疗
Can J Cardiol. 2005 Jun;21(8):657-72.

本文引用的文献

1
The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Report by the Management Committee.澳大利亚轻度高血压治疗试验。管理委员会报告。
Lancet. 1980 Jun 14;1(8181):1261-7.
2
The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.全国高血压检测、评估与治疗联合委员会1988年报告。
Arch Intern Med. 1988 May;148(5):1023-38.
3
1986 guidelines for the treatment of mild hypertension: memorandum from a WHO/ISH meeting.1986年轻度高血压治疗指南:世界卫生组织/国际高血压学会会议纪要
J Hypertens. 1986 Jun;4(3):383-6. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198606000-00021.
4
MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.医学研究委员会轻度高血压治疗试验:主要结果。医学研究委员会工作组
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jul 13;291(6488):97-104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6488.97.
5
Mortality and morbidity results from the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly trial.欧洲老年高血压工作组试验的死亡率和发病率结果。
Lancet. 1985 Jun 15;1(8442):1349-54. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91783-0.
6
Race and sex differentials in the impact of hypertension in the United States. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study.美国高血压影响方面的种族和性别差异。第一次全国健康和营养检查调查的流行病学随访研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Apr;149(4):780-8.
7
Treating mild hypertension. Report of the British Hypertension Society working party.轻度高血压的治疗。英国高血压学会工作组报告。
BMJ. 1989 Mar 18;298(6675):694-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6675.694.
8
Blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) and risk of fatal coronary heart disease.血压(收缩压和舒张压)与致命性冠心病风险
Hypertension. 1989 May;13(5 Suppl):I2-12. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.13.5_suppl.i2.
9
First line treatment in hypertension.高血压的一线治疗。
BMJ. 1990 Nov 24;301(6762):1172-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6762.1172.
10
Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.血压、中风与冠心病。第2部分,血压的短期降低:在流行病学背景下随机药物试验综述
Lancet. 1990 Apr 7;335(8693):827-38. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90944-z.