Sundmacher R, Neumann-Haefelin D, Manthey K F, Müller O
J Infect Dis. 1976 Jun;133 Suppl:A160-4. doi: 10.1093/infdis/133.supplement_2.a160.
Seventy-three patients with herpetic epithelial keratitis were randomly divided into three groups and were treated by local applications of human leukocyte interferon, thermocautery plus human leukocyte interferon, or thermocautery plus mock human leukocyte interferon to obtain information on whether therapy with human leukocyte interferon can serve as a substitute for mechanical debridement of the involved epithelium or can improve the results when given as additional therapy. Fifty-five patients (75%) yielded herpes simplex virus before treatment, and only the results in these patients with keratitis of proved viral etiology were included in the analysis. These results indicated that mechanical debridement cannot be replaced with local application of human leukocyte interferon (3-4 X 10(4) units per day). When given in addition to thermocautery, human leukocyte interferon may have been of some value in a number of patients. However, the results were not statistically significant. A more potent dosage of human leukocyte interferon might provide better results.
73例疱疹性上皮性角膜炎患者被随机分为三组,分别采用局部应用人白细胞干扰素、热烧灼加人白细胞干扰素或热烧灼加模拟人白细胞干扰素进行治疗,以获取关于人白细胞干扰素治疗是否可替代受累上皮的机械清创,或作为辅助治疗时能否改善治疗效果的信息。55例患者(75%)在治疗前检测出单纯疱疹病毒,分析仅纳入这些确诊为病毒病因性角膜炎患者的结果。这些结果表明,局部应用人白细胞干扰素(每日3 - 4×10⁴单位)不能替代机械清创。热烧灼联合人白细胞干扰素治疗时,对部分患者可能有一定价值。然而,结果无统计学意义。更高剂量的人白细胞干扰素可能会产生更好的效果。