McLafferty Fred W, Breuker Kathrin, Jin Mi, Han Xuemei, Infusini Giuseppe, Jiang Honghai, Kong Xianglei, Begley Tadhg P
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
FEBS J. 2007 Dec;274(24):6256-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06147.x. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
For the characterization of protein sequences and post-translational modifications by MS, the 'top-down' proteomics approach utilizes molecular and fragment ion mass data obtained by ionizing and dissociating a protein in the mass spectrometer. This requires more complex instrumentation and methodology than the far more widely used 'bottom-up' approach, which instead uses such data of peptides from the protein's digestion, but the top-down data are far more specific. The ESI MS spectrum of a 14 protein mixture provides full separation of its molecular ions for MS/MS dissociation of the individual components. False-positive rates for the identification of proteins are far lower with the top-down approach, and quantitation of multiply modified isomers is more efficient. Bottom-up proteolysis destroys the information on the size of the protein and the connectivities of the peptide fragments, but it has no size limit for protein digestion. In contrast, the top-down approach has a approximately 500 residue, approximately 50 kDa limitation for the extensive molecular ion dissociation required. Basic studies indicate that this molecular ion intractability arises from greatly strengthened electrostatic interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, in the gas-phase molecular ions. This limit is now greatly extended by variable thermal and collisional activation just after electrospray ('prefolding dissociation'). This process can cleave 287 inter-residue bonds in the termini of a 1314 residue (144 kDa) protein, specify previously unidentified disulfide bonds between eight of 27 cysteines in a 1714 residue (200 kDa) protein, and correct sequence predictions in two proteins, one of 2153 residues (229 kDa).
对于通过质谱对蛋白质序列和翻译后修饰进行表征,“自上而下”的蛋白质组学方法利用在质谱仪中使蛋白质电离和解离所获得的分子离子和碎片离子质量数据。与使用更为广泛的“自下而上”方法相比,这需要更复杂的仪器和方法,“自下而上”方法使用的是蛋白质消化产生的肽段的此类数据,但自上而下的数据更为特异。14种蛋白质混合物的电喷雾质谱图能完全分离其分子离子,以便对各个组分进行串联质谱解离。使用自上而下的方法鉴定蛋白质时假阳性率要低得多,并且对多重修饰异构体的定量更为有效。自下而上的蛋白酶解会破坏有关蛋白质大小和肽段连接性的信息,但它对蛋白质消化没有大小限制。相比之下,自上而下的方法对于所需的广泛分子离子解离有大约500个残基、约50 kDa的限制。基础研究表明,这种分子离子难处理性源于气相分子离子中大大增强的静电相互作用,如氢键。现在,通过电喷雾后紧接着的可变热激活和碰撞激活(“预折叠解离”),这个限制已大大扩展。这个过程可以切割1314个残基(144 kDa)蛋白质末端的287个残基间键,确定1714个残基(200 kDa)蛋白质中27个半胱氨酸中的8个之间先前未鉴定的二硫键,并校正两种蛋白质(一种为2153个残基(229 kDa))中的序列预测。