Brown Sam P, Le Chat Ludovic, Taddei François
Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2008 Jan;11(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01125.x. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
Virulence is generally considered to benefit parasites by enhancing resource-transfer from host to pathogen. Here, we offer an alternative framework where virulent immune-provoking behaviours and enhanced immune resistance are joint tactics of invading pathogens to eliminate resident competitors (transferring resources from resident to invading pathogen). The pathogen wins by creating a novel immunological challenge to which it is already adapted. We analyse a general ecological model of 'proactive invasion' where invaders not adapted to a local environment can succeed by changing it to one where they are better adapted than residents. However, the two-trait nature of the 'proactive' strategy (provocation of, and adaptation to environmental change) presents an evolutionary conundrum, as neither trait alone is favoured in a homogenous host population. We show that this conundrum can be resolved by allowing for host heterogeneity. We relate our model to emerging empirical findings on immunological mediation of parasite competition.
毒力通常被认为有利于寄生虫,因为它能增强从宿主到病原体的资源转移。在此,我们提供了一个不同的框架,即引发免疫的毒力行为和增强的免疫抗性是入侵病原体消除常驻竞争者的联合策略(将资源从常驻者转移到入侵病原体)。病原体通过制造一种它已适应的新的免疫挑战而获胜。我们分析了一个“主动入侵”的一般生态模型,在该模型中,未适应本地环境的入侵者可以通过将环境改变为一个它们比常驻者更适应的环境而成功。然而,“主动”策略的双性状性质(引发环境变化并适应环境变化)带来了一个进化难题,因为在同质宿主群体中,单独的任何一个性状都不受青睐。我们表明,通过考虑宿主的异质性可以解决这个难题。我们将我们的模型与关于寄生虫竞争的免疫介导的新实证发现联系起来。