Barsky Lauren E, Trainor Joseph E, Torres Manuel R, Aguirre Benigno E
Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, US.
Disasters. 2007 Dec;31(4):495-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01021.x.
In the aftermath of disasters it is not uncommon for a large number of individuals, ranging from professional technical responders to untrained, albeit well meaning, volunteers, to converge on site of a disaster in order to offer to help victims or other responders. Because volunteers can be both a help and a hindrance in disaster response, they pose a paradox to professional responders at the scene. Through focus group interviews and in-depth structured interviews, this paper presents an extended example of how Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) task forces, a type of professional technical-responder organisation, interact with and utilise volunteers. Findings show that US&R task forces evaluate the volunteers in terms of their presumed legitimacy, utility, and potential liability or danger posed during the disaster response. Other responses to volunteers such as a feeling of powerlessness or the use of volunteers in non-technical ways are also explored. This paper demonstrates some key aspects of the relationship between volunteers and formal response organisations in disasters.
在灾难发生后,大量人员从专业技术救援人员到未经训练但善意满满的志愿者,纷纷涌向灾难现场,想要帮助受害者或其他救援人员,这种情况并不罕见。由于志愿者在灾难应对中既可能有所帮助,也可能造成阻碍,他们给现场的专业救援人员带来了一个悖论。通过焦点小组访谈和深入的结构化访谈,本文给出了一个详细例子,说明城市搜救(US&R)特遣部队(一种专业技术救援组织类型)如何与志愿者互动并利用志愿者。研究结果表明,城市搜救特遣部队会根据志愿者在灾难应对期间假定的合法性、效用以及潜在责任或危险来评估他们。本文还探讨了对志愿者的其他反应,如无力感或在非技术方面使用志愿者的情况。本文展示了灾难中志愿者与正式救援组织之间关系的一些关键方面。