Suppr超能文献

通过无创测量碳氧血红蛋白水平来调整肺功能测试期间测得的弥散能力。

Noninvasive measurement of carboxyhemoglobin levels for adjustment of diffusion capacity measured during pulmonary function testing.

作者信息

Mahoney Anne M, Stimpson Claudia L, Scott Karen L, Hampson Neil B

机构信息

Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, C7-PUL, Seattle WA 98101, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2007 Dec;52(12):1741-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (D(LCO)) is commonly measured during pulmonary function testing (PFT). Although adjustment of the measured D(LCO) for an elevated baseline carboxyhemoglobin level is recommended, carboxyhemoglobin is not routinely measured, which may reduce the accuracy of D(LCO) measurements. We sought to assess the utility of routine carboxyhemoglobin measurement and subsequent D(LCO) correction in patients referred for PFT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive PFT results, including D(LCO) assessment. We used a pulse CO-oximeter (recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration) to noninvasively measure baseline carboxyhemoglobin (S(pCO)). We used simple descriptive statistics to compare the S(pCO) values. In subjects with elevated S(pCO) (> 2%) we adjusted the percent-of-predicted D(LCO). Interpretation of D(LCO) was categorized according to the American Thoracic Society classification scheme for respiratory impairment.

RESULTS

The self-reported smokers had higher average S(pCO) than did self-reported nonsmokers (1.6% vs 3.5%, p < 0.001), although 14% of nonsmokers had an elevated S(pCO) and 26% of smokers had normal S(pCO). When the D(LCO) was corrected for elevated S(pCO), 2 patients moved from a category of moderate impairment to mild impairment. Both were smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

The noninvasive measurement of carboxyhemoglobin is easy to perform during PFT. When precise measurement of D(LCO) is important, noninvasive measurement of carboxyhemoglobin may be of value. If routine S(pCO) measurement is considered, the highest yield is among current smokers.

摘要

背景

肺一氧化碳弥散量(D(LCO))通常在肺功能测试(PFT)期间进行测量。尽管建议针对基线碳氧血红蛋白水平升高对测得的D(LCO)进行校正,但碳氧血红蛋白并非常规测量项目,这可能会降低D(LCO)测量的准确性。我们旨在评估在接受PFT检查的患者中常规测量碳氧血红蛋白并随后校正D(LCO)的效用。

方法

我们回顾性分析了连续100例PFT结果,包括D(LCO)评估。我们使用脉搏碳氧血红蛋白仪(最近获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准)无创测量基线碳氧血红蛋白(S(pCO))。我们使用简单描述性统计来比较S(pCO)值。在S(pCO)升高(>2%)的受试者中,我们对预测的D(LCO)百分比进行了校正。根据美国胸科学会呼吸功能损害分类方案对D(LCO)的结果进行分类解读。

结果

自我报告的吸烟者平均S(pCO)高于自我报告的非吸烟者(1.6%对3.5%,p<0.001),尽管14%的非吸烟者S(pCO)升高,26%的吸烟者S(pCO)正常。当针对升高的S(pCO)校正D(LCO)时,有2例患者从中度损害类别转变为轻度损害类别。这2例均为吸烟者。

结论

在PFT期间,无创测量碳氧血红蛋白操作简便。当精确测量D(LCO)很重要时,无创测量碳氧血红蛋白可能有价值。如果考虑常规测量S(pCO),当前吸烟者的收益最高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验