Boissiere Julien, Eder Véronique, Machet Marie-Christine, Courteix Daniel, Bonnet Pierre
Laboratoire de Physiopathologie de la Paroi Artérielle, EA 3852, UFR Médecine, Université François Rabelais, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37032 Tours Cedex 1, France.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Feb;104(2):321-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00442.2007. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
Exercise training and hypertension induced cardiac hypertrophy but modulate differently left ventricle (LV) function. This study set out to evaluate cardiac adaptations induced by moderate exercise training in normotensive and untreated severe hypertensive rats. Four groups of animals were studied: normotensive (Ctl) and severe hypertensive (HT) Wistar rats were assigned to be sedentary (Sed) or perform a moderate exercise training (Ex) over a 10-wk period. Severe hypertension was induced in rat by a two-kidney, one-clip model. At the end of the training period, hemodynamic parameters and LV morphology and function were assessed using catheterism and conventional pulsed Doppler echocardiography. LV histology was performed to study fibrosis infiltrations. Severe hypertension increased systolic blood pressure to 202 +/- 9 mmHg and induced pathological hypertrophy (LV hypertrophy index was 0.34 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.44 +/- 0.02 in Ctl-Sed and HT-Sed groups, respectively) with LV relaxation alteration (early-to-atrial wave ratio = 2.02 +/- 0.11 vs. 1.63 +/- 0.12). Blood pressure was not altered by exercise training, but arterial stiffness was reduced in trained hypertensive rats (pulse pressure was 75 +/- 7 vs. 62 +/- 3 mmHg in HT-Sed and HT-Ex groups, respectively). Exercise training induced eccentric hypertrophy in both Ex groups by increasing LV cavity without alteration of LV systolic function. However, LV hypertrophy index was significantly decreased in normotensive rats only (0.34 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.02 in Ctl-Sed and Ctl-Ex groups, respectively). Moreover, exercise training improved LV passive filling in Ctl-Ex rats but not in Ht-Ex rats. In this study, exercise training did not reduce blood pressure and induced an additional physiological hypertrophy in untreated HT rats, which was slightly blunted when compared with Ctl rats. However, cardiac function was not worsened by exercise training.
运动训练与高血压均会导致心脏肥大,但对左心室(LV)功能的调节方式不同。本研究旨在评估适度运动训练对正常血压和未经治疗的重度高血压大鼠心脏适应性的影响。研究了四组动物:正常血压(Ctl)和重度高血压(HT)的Wistar大鼠被分为久坐不动组(Sed)或在10周内进行适度运动训练组(Ex)。通过双肾单夹模型诱导大鼠发生重度高血压。在训练期结束时,使用导管插入术和传统脉冲多普勒超声心动图评估血流动力学参数以及左心室形态和功能。进行左心室组织学检查以研究纤维化浸润情况。重度高血压使收缩压升高至202±9 mmHg,并导致病理性肥大(左心室肥大指数在Ctl-Sed组和HT-Sed组分别为0.34±0.02和0.44±0.02),同时伴有左心室舒张功能改变(早期与心房波比值 = 2.02±0.11和1.63±0.12)。运动训练未改变血压,但训练后的高血压大鼠动脉僵硬度降低(HT-Sed组和HT-Ex组的脉压分别为75±7和62±3 mmHg)。运动训练通过增加左心室腔大小在两个运动训练组中均诱导了离心性肥大,且未改变左心室收缩功能。然而,仅在正常血压大鼠中左心室肥大指数显著降低(Ctl-Sed组和Ctl-Ex组分别为0.34±0.02和0.30±0.02)。此外,运动训练改善了Ctl-Ex大鼠的左心室被动充盈,但未改善Ht-Ex大鼠的。在本研究中,运动训练未降低血压,且在未经治疗的高血压大鼠中诱导了额外的生理性肥大,与Ctl大鼠相比这种肥大略有减弱。然而,运动训练并未使心脏功能恶化。