Mujica-Parodi Lilianne R, Korgaonkar Mayuresh, Ravindranath Bosky, Greenberg Tsafrir, Tomasi Dardo, Wagshul Mark, Ardekani Babak, Guilfoyle David, Khan Shilpi, Zhong Yuru, Chon Ki, Malaspina Dolores
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8181, USA.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Jan;30(1):47-58. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20483.
We tested whether dynamic interaction between limbic regions supports a control systems model of excitatory and inhibitory components of a negative feedback loop, and whether dysregulation of those dynamics might correlate with trait differences in anxiety and their cardiac characteristics among healthy adults.
Sixty-five subjects received fMRI scans while passively viewing angry, fearful, happy, and neutral facial stimuli. Subjects also completed a trait anxiety inventory, and were monitored using ambulatory wake ECG. The ECG data were analyzed for heart rate variability, a measure of autonomic regulation. The fMRI data were analyzed with respect to six limbic regions (bilateral amygdala, bilateral hippocampus, Brodmann Areas 9, 45) using limbic time-series cross-correlations, maximum BOLD amplitude, and BOLD amplitude at each point in the time-series.
Diminished coupling between limbic time-series in response to the neutral, fearful, and happy faces was associated with greater trait anxiety, greater sympathetic activation, and lowered heart rate variability. Individuals with greater levels of trait anxiety showed delayed activation of Brodmann Area 45 in response to the fearful and happy faces, and lowered Brodmann Area 45 activation with prolonged left amygdala activation in response to the neutral faces.
The dynamics support limbic regulation as a control system, in which dysregulation, as assessed by diminished coupling between limbic time-series, is associated with increased trait anxiety and excitatory autonomic outputs. Trait-anxious individuals showed delayed inhibitory activation in response to overt-affect stimuli and diminished inhibitory activation with delayed extinction of excitatory activation in response to ambiguous-affect stimuli.
我们测试了边缘区域之间的动态相互作用是否支持负反馈回路的兴奋性和抑制性成分的控制系统模型,以及这些动态的失调是否可能与健康成年人焦虑特质差异及其心脏特征相关。
65名受试者在被动观看愤怒、恐惧、快乐和中性面部刺激时接受功能磁共振成像扫描。受试者还完成了特质焦虑量表,并使用动态心电图进行监测。分析心电图数据以获取心率变异性,这是自主调节的一项指标。使用边缘时间序列互相关、最大血氧水平依赖(BOLD)幅度以及时间序列中每个点的BOLD幅度,对六个边缘区域(双侧杏仁核、双侧海马体、布罗德曼9区、45区)的功能磁共振成像数据进行分析。
对中性、恐惧和快乐面孔做出反应时,边缘时间序列之间的耦合减弱与更高的特质焦虑、更强的交感神经激活以及更低的心率变异性相关。特质焦虑水平较高的个体在对恐惧和快乐面孔做出反应时,布罗德曼45区的激活延迟,并且在对中性面孔做出反应时,随着左侧杏仁核激活时间延长,布罗德曼45区的激活降低。
这些动态支持边缘调节作为一种控制系统,其中通过边缘时间序列之间耦合减弱评估的失调与特质焦虑增加和兴奋性自主输出相关。特质焦虑个体在对明显情感刺激做出反应时表现出延迟的抑制性激活,并且在对模糊情感刺激做出反应时,随着兴奋性激活的延迟消退,抑制性激活减弱。