• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩锁关节脱位:在尸体模型中对掌长肌腱移植重建与其他增强方法的比较生物力学研究。

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models.

作者信息

Luis Guntur E, Yong Chee-Khuen, Singh Deepak A, Sengupta S, Choon David Sk

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2007 Nov 27;2:22. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-22.

DOI:10.1186/1749-799X-2-22
PMID:18042292
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2235831/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular injuries are common in sports medicine. Surgical intervention is generally advocated for chronic instability of Rockwood grade III and more severe injuries. Various methods of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction and augmentation have been described. The objective of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of a novel palmaris-longus tendon reconstruction with those of the native AC+CC ligaments, the modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction, the ACJ capsuloligamentous complex repair, screw and clavicle hook plate augmentation.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no difference, biomechanically, amongst the various reconstruction and augmentative methods.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory cadaveric study.

METHODS

54 cadaveric native (acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular) ligaments were tested using the Instron machine. Superior loading was performed in the 6 groups: 1) in the intact states, 2) after modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction (WD), 3) after modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction with acromioclavicular joint capsuloligamentous repair (WD.ACJ), 4) after modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction with clavicular hook plate augmentation (WD.CP) or 5) after modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction with coracoclavicular screw augmentation (WD.BS) and 6) after modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction with mersilene tape-palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction (WD. PLmt). Posterior-anterior (horizontal) loading was similarly performed in all groups, except groups 4 and 5. The respective failure loads, stiffnesses, displacements at failure and modes of failure were recorded. Data analysis was carried out using a one-way ANOVA, with Student's unpaired t-test for unpaired data (S-PLUS statistical package 2005).

RESULTS

Native ligaments were the strongest and stiffest when compared to other modes of reconstruction and augmentation except coracoclavicular screw, in both posterior-anterior and superior directions (p < 0.005).WD.ACJ provided additional posterior-anterior (P = 0. 039) but not superior (p = 0.250) stability when compared to WD alone.WD+PLmt, in loads and stiffness at failure superiorly, was similar to WD+CP (p = 0.066). WD+PLmt, in loads and stiffness at failure postero-anteriorly, was similar to WD+ACJ (p = 0.084).Superiorly, WD+CP had similar strength as WD+BS (p = 0.057), but it was less stiff (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Modified Weaver-Dunn procedure must always be supplemented with acromioclavicular capsuloligamentous repair to increase posterior-anterior stability. Palmaris-Longus tendon graft provides both additional superior and posterior-anterior stability when used for acromioclavicular capsuloligamentous reconstruction. It is a good alternative to clavicle hook plate in acromioclavicular dislocation.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/1397d7e8c713/1749-799X-2-22-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/02b92404a5c0/1749-799X-2-22-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/d302ffbd6c74/1749-799X-2-22-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/9fff94c0d96e/1749-799X-2-22-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/ae7b1bd3c12c/1749-799X-2-22-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/1397d7e8c713/1749-799X-2-22-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/02b92404a5c0/1749-799X-2-22-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/d302ffbd6c74/1749-799X-2-22-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/9fff94c0d96e/1749-799X-2-22-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/ae7b1bd3c12c/1749-799X-2-22-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fe1/2235831/1397d7e8c713/1749-799X-2-22-5.jpg
摘要

背景

肩锁关节损伤在运动医学中很常见。对于Rockwood III级及更严重损伤的慢性不稳定,一般主张手术干预。已描述了多种喙锁韧带重建和增强的方法。本研究的目的是比较一种新型掌长肌腱重建与天然肩锁+喙锁韧带、改良Weaver-Dunn重建、肩锁关节囊韧带复合体修复、螺钉和锁骨钩钢板增强的生物力学特性。

假设

各种重建和增强方法在生物力学上没有差异。

研究设计

对照实验室尸体研究。

方法

使用Instron机器对54条尸体天然(肩锁和喙锁)韧带进行测试。在6组中进行上向加载:1)完整状态下,2)改良Weaver-Dunn重建(WD)后,3)改良Weaver-Dunn重建联合肩锁关节囊韧带修复(WD.ACJ)后,4)改良Weaver-Dunn重建联合锁骨钩钢板增强(WD.CP)后或5)改良Weaver-Dunn重建联合喙锁螺钉增强(WD.BS)后,以及6)改良Weaver-Dunn重建联合涤纶带-掌长肌腱移植重建(WD.PLmt)后。除第4组和第5组外,所有组均类似地进行前后(水平)加载。记录各自的失效载荷、刚度、失效时的位移和失效模式。使用单向方差分析进行数据分析,对未配对数据使用学生未配对t检验(S-PLUS统计软件包2005)。

结果

与其他重建和增强方式相比,除喙锁螺钉外,天然韧带在前后和上向方向均最强且最硬(p < 0.005)。与单独的WD相比,WD.ACJ提供了额外的前后稳定性(P = 0.039),但上向稳定性未增加(p = 0.250)。WD+PLmt在上向失效载荷和刚度方面与WD+CP相似(p = 0.066)。WD+PLmt在前后向失效载荷和刚度方面与WD+ACJ相似(p = 0.084)。在上向,WD+CP与WD+BS强度相似(p = 0.057),但刚度较小(p <

相似文献

1
Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models.肩锁关节脱位:在尸体模型中对掌长肌腱移植重建与其他增强方法的比较生物力学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2007 Nov 27;2:22. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-22.
2
Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study.半腱肌肌腱移植与改良Weaver-Dunn手术治疗慢性肩锁关节重建的前瞻性对比研究
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jan;37(1):181-90. doi: 10.1177/0363546508323255. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
3
Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.解剖学肩锁韧带重建:肩锁关节重建技术的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1723-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546505275646. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
4
Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic and Extra-Anatomic Reconstruction Techniques Using Local Grafts for Chronic Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint.使用局部移植物治疗肩锁关节慢性不稳定的解剖和非解剖重建技术的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1927-1935. doi: 10.1177/0363546518770603. Epub 2018 May 10.
5
Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation.关节镜下喙锁关节不稳定修复的生物力学比较:无生物增强的缝合纽扣系统。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2218-25. doi: 10.1177/0363546511416784. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
6
Stability of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: biomechanical testing of various surgical techniques in a cadaveric model.肩锁关节重建的稳定性:尸体模型中各种手术技术的生物力学测试
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Sep;32(6):1492-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546504263699. Epub 2004 Jul 20.
7
Biomechanical properties of repairs for dislocated AC joints using suture button systems with integrated tendon augmentation.使用带肌腱增强的缝合扣系统修复脱位的 AC 关节的生物力学特性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Oct;20(10):1931-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1828-y. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
8
Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.改良 Weaver-Dunn 与游离组织移植重建肩锁关节复合体的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1196-203. doi: 10.1177/0363546509361160. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
9
A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.解剖学喙锁韧带重建的生物力学评估
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):236-46. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281795. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
10
Modified Weaver-Dunn Procedure Versus The Use of Semitendinosus Autogenous Tendon Graft for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.改良Weaver-Dunn手术与使用自体半腱肌腱移植进行肩锁关节重建的比较
Open Orthop J. 2016 May 31;10:166-78. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010166. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution and trends in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations: an epidemiological analysis from Germany between 2013 and 2023.肩锁关节脱位治疗的演变与趋势:2013年至2023年德国的一项流行病学分析
JSES Int. 2025 Apr 1;9(4):1040-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.03.005. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A Novel Anatomical Double Bundle Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with Semi Tendinosus Graft-A Functional Outcome Assessment Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital Of Eastern India.一种采用半腱肌移植物的新型解剖双束肩锁关节重建术——印度东部一家三级护理医院的功能结果评估研究
Indian J Orthop. 2025 May 14;59(6):840-847. doi: 10.1007/s43465-025-01385-7. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Complete dislocations of the acromiclavicular joint; the nature of the traumatic lesion and effective methods of treatment with an analysis of forty-one cases.肩锁关节完全脱位;创伤性损伤的性质及有效的治疗方法——附41例分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1946 Oct;28(4):813-37.
2
Load elongation behavior of the canine anterior cruciate ligament.犬前交叉韧带的负荷伸长行为。
J Biomech Eng. 1980 Aug;102(3):190. doi: 10.1115/1.3149572.
3
A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.解剖学喙锁韧带重建的生物力学评估
Acromioclavicular joint dislocation with loop double endobutton fixation assisted by orthopaedic surgery robot positioning system.
骨科手术机器人定位系统辅助下的带袢双 Endobutton 固定治疗肩锁关节脱位。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 26;25(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07724-3.
4
Modified Weaver Dunn Versus Ligamentous Reconstruction Grafts in Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.改良Weaver Dunn术与韧带重建移植物治疗慢性肩锁关节脱位的比较:比较研究的系统评价和Meta分析
J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast. 2024 Jul 23;8:24715492241266133. doi: 10.1177/24715492241266133. eCollection 2024.
5
An In Vitro Study Demonstrating the Significance of Acromioclavicular Ligament Repair in Restoring Horizontal and Rotational Acromioclavicular Joint Stability.一项体外研究表明肩锁韧带修复在恢复肩锁关节水平和旋转稳定性方面的重要性。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 29;16(3):e57193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57193. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations graded Rockwood III-V: a retrospective and comparative study between three different surgical techniques.Rockwood III - V级急性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:三种不同手术技术的回顾性比较研究
Acta Biomed. 2021 Nov 5;92(5):e2021325. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.10678.
7
Chronic acromioclavicular dislocations: multidirectional stabilization without grafting.慢性肩锁关节脱位:无需移植的多向稳定术
JSES Int. 2020 May 26;4(3):519-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.04.014. eCollection 2020 Sep.
8
Medium- to long-term results of acromioclavicular joint stabilisation using the Ligament Augmentation Reconstruction System (LARS) ligament.使用韧带增强重建系统(LARS)韧带进行肩锁关节稳定术的中长期结果
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Jun;12(3):163-169. doi: 10.1177/1758573219833697. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
Comparison of clavicular hook plate with and without coracoclavicular suture fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.带与不带喙锁韧带缝合固定的锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Nov;53(6):408-413. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
10
Functional Outcome of Modified Weaver Dunn Technique for Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.改良Weaver Dunn技术治疗肩锁关节脱位的功能结局
Indian J Orthop. 2018 Jul-Aug;52(4):418-422. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_469_16.
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Feb;34(2):236-46. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281795. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
4
Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.解剖学肩锁韧带重建:肩锁关节重建技术的生物力学比较
Am J Sports Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):1723-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546505275646. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
5
Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.肩锁关节完全脱位后喙锁韧带解剖重建的生物力学原理。
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1929-36. doi: 10.1177/0363546504264637.
6
Stability of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: biomechanical testing of various surgical techniques in a cadaveric model.肩锁关节重建的稳定性:尸体模型中各种手术技术的生物力学测试
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Sep;32(6):1492-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546504263699. Epub 2004 Jul 20.
7
Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study.肌腱移植重建喙锁韧带:一项比较生物力学研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;31(5):648-55. doi: 10.1177/03635465030310050301.
8
How four weeks of implantation affect the strength and stiffness of a tendon graft in a bone tunnel: a study of two fixation devices in an extraarticular model in ovine.四周的植入如何影响骨隧道中肌腱移植物的强度和刚度:一项在绵羊关节外模型中对两种固定装置的研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;30(4):506-13. doi: 10.1177/03635465020300041001.
9
Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics.关节囊损伤对肩锁关节力学的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Sep;83(9):1344-51. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200109000-00009.
10
Biomechanics of the coracoclavicular ligament complex and augmentations used in its repair and reconstruction.喙锁韧带复合体的生物力学及其修复与重建中使用的增强技术。
Am J Sports Med. 2000 May-Jun;28(3):380-4. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280031701.