• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rockwood III - V级急性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:三种不同手术技术的回顾性比较研究

Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations graded Rockwood III-V: a retrospective and comparative study between three different surgical techniques.

作者信息

Fosser Michele, Camporese Antonio

机构信息

a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:84:"Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ospedale Alto Vicentino, Santorso (VI)";}.

2Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme (PD), Italy.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2021 Nov 5;92(5):e2021325. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.10678.

DOI:10.23750/abm.v92i5.10678
PMID:34738583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8689325/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

the optimal treatment of acute type III-V acromioclavicular (A-C) Rockwood dislocations is still a matter of discussion in orthopaedic surgery.

AIM OF THE WORK

retrospective and comparative evaluation of the clinical and radiographic results of three different surgical techniques for stabilization of A-C joint using tension band wiring, hook plate and TightRope.

METHODS

a consecutive series of patients, treated from January 2014 and November 2019, were divided into three groups according to the surgical method used. They were clinically and radiographically assessed and the results were compared with those present in the literature.

RESULTS

66 patients, with a mean age of 44.7 years, were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 37.7 months (range 6-58 months). All patients, regardless of the group, had satisfactory outcome. According to the DASH score, statistically significant difference favours the TightRope Group (TRG) fixation (p<0.005). The TRG showed the highest mean Constant score (96,1); there are no significative differences between the clinical scores of Hook Plate Group (HPG) and Tension Band Wiring Group (TBWG). However, these two methods showed numerous complications, especially metal-work mobilization and stiffness respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

good results can be overall achieved with primary fixation by the three different surgical methods under investigation. The TightRope system exhibited some advantages such as higher clinical scores, early recovery of range of  movements, longitudinal surgical incision with non-keloid scar, no need for a second surgery and lower rate of complications.

摘要

背景

急性III - V型肩锁关节(A - C)Rockwood脱位的最佳治疗方法在骨外科领域仍是一个讨论的话题。

研究目的

回顾性比较评估三种不同手术技术(张力带钢丝固定、钩钢板固定和TightRope固定)用于稳定肩锁关节的临床和影像学结果。

方法

对2014年1月至2019年11月连续收治的患者,根据所采用的手术方法分为三组。对他们进行临床和影像学评估,并将结果与文献中的结果进行比较。

结果

纳入66例患者,平均年龄44.7岁,平均随访37.7个月(6 - 58个月)。所有患者,无论所属组别,均取得满意结果。根据DASH评分,统计学上显著差异有利于TightRope组(TRG)固定(p<0.005)。TRG组的平均Constant评分最高(96.1);钩钢板组(HPG)和张力带钢丝组(TBWG)的临床评分之间无显著差异。然而,这两种方法分别出现了许多并发症,尤其是金属部件松动和关节僵硬。

结论

所研究的三种不同手术方法进行一期固定总体上均可取得良好效果。TightRope系统表现出一些优势,如临床评分较高、活动范围早期恢复、纵向手术切口且无瘢痕疙瘩、无需二次手术以及并发症发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/98e1e29caa4e/ACTA-92-325-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/184bb457b35a/ACTA-92-325-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/6a7cffab239d/ACTA-92-325-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/8ebfe04e8d73/ACTA-92-325-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/0ec3b85abafc/ACTA-92-325-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/58f3ced580ab/ACTA-92-325-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/f2002019d47e/ACTA-92-325-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/1fbf12b04173/ACTA-92-325-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/9268c4038e97/ACTA-92-325-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/21b7c68562de/ACTA-92-325-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/98e1e29caa4e/ACTA-92-325-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/184bb457b35a/ACTA-92-325-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/6a7cffab239d/ACTA-92-325-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/8ebfe04e8d73/ACTA-92-325-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/0ec3b85abafc/ACTA-92-325-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/58f3ced580ab/ACTA-92-325-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/f2002019d47e/ACTA-92-325-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/1fbf12b04173/ACTA-92-325-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/9268c4038e97/ACTA-92-325-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/21b7c68562de/ACTA-92-325-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab69/8689325/98e1e29caa4e/ACTA-92-325-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations graded Rockwood III-V: a retrospective and comparative study between three different surgical techniques.Rockwood III - V级急性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:三种不同手术技术的回顾性比较研究
Acta Biomed. 2021 Nov 5;92(5):e2021325. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.10678.
2
Comparison of hook plate alone, hook plate augmented with suture anchor, and arthroscopically-assisted tightrope fixation in the treatment of patients with acute type v acromioclavicular joint dislocations.单纯钩钢板、钩钢板联合缝线锚钉与关节镜下经皮张力带固定治疗急性 V 型肩锁关节脱位的比较。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Jun;109(4):103494. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103494. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
Comparative study on the treatment of Rockwood type III acute acromioclavicular dislocation: Clinical results from the TightRope technique vs. K-wire fixation.RockwoodⅢ型急性肩锁关节脱位治疗的比较研究:TightRope技术与克氏针固定的临床结果
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):171-176. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
4
Is AC TightRope fixation better than Bosworth screw fixation for minimally invasive operative treatment of Rockwood III AC joint injury?对于Rockwood III型肩锁关节损伤的微创治疗,解剖型钛缆固定是否优于Bosworth螺钉固定?
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.060. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
5
Clavicular hook plate for acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocation involving Rockwood type V: clinical and radiological outcomes and complications evaluation.锁骨钩钢板治疗涉及 Rockwood Ⅴ型的急性高分级肩锁关节脱位:临床和影像学结果及并发症评估。
Int Orthop. 2022 Oct;46(10):2405-2411. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05498-8. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.在接受钩板或物理治疗的 III 型和 V 型肩锁关节脱位患者中,2 年随访时临床结果无差异:一项随机对照试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):1122-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
7
Comparison of hook plate with versus without double-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for repair of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.钩钢板与双隧道喙锁韧带重建治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的比较:前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
8
Comparison of open reduction and fixation with hook plate and modified closed reduction and fixation with tightrope loop plate for treatment of rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation.经皮微创复位固定与切开复位 Hook 板内固定治疗 RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 29;23(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05261-5.
9
Operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations Rockwood III and V-Comparative study between K-wires combined with FiberTape(®) vs. TightRope System(®).Rockwood III型和V型急性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗——克氏针联合FiberTape(®)与TightRope系统(®)的对比研究
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.053. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
10
Comparison of the Tight Rope Technique and Clavicular Hook Plate for the Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.比较Tight Rope技术与锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效
J Invest Surg. 2018 Jun;31(3):226-233. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1305022. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative meta-analysis of TightRope vs. hook plate for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.TightRope与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的比较荟萃分析
Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2025 May 10;42:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2025.04.001. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Comparison of Double Endobutton and Clavicular Hook Plate in Acromioclavicular Joint Disruption: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.双Endobutton与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Afr Med. 2024 Oct 1;23(4):535-547. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_13_24. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
3
Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety in Treating Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation with Five Different Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The Tight-Rope Technique versus Clavicular Hook Plate for Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮克氏针张力带固定与锁骨钩钢板治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的系统评价和 Meta 分析
J Invest Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):20-29. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1593558. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment of Rockwood type-III acromioclavicular dislocation: A meta-analysis.RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位手术治疗与保守治疗的比较:一项Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jan;97(4):e9690. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009690.
3
Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation using the endobutton.
五种不同手术治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(8):1944-1958. doi: 10.1111/os.13731. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
4
Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Using a Double Augmentation With Hamstrings Tendon and Dermal Graft.使用腘绳肌腱和真皮移植双重增强技术重建肩锁关节
Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Nov 18;12(3):e433-e440. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.08.049. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Clinical outcomes for grades III-V acromioclavicular dislocations favor double-button fixation compared to clavicle hook plate fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肩锁关节脱位 III-V 度患者的临床疗效,双纽扣固定优于锁骨钩钢板固定:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2831-2846. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03492-3. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
使用Endobutton治疗肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗
Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 May-Jun;25(3):81-84. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220172503166657.
4
Comparison of the Tight Rope Technique and Clavicular Hook Plate for the Treatment of Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.比较Tight Rope技术与锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效
J Invest Surg. 2018 Jun;31(3):226-233. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1305022. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性不稳定型肩锁关节脱位中,悬吊环固定装置与钩钢板的术后结局及并发症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Dec;18(4):293-304. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0451-1. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
6
Comparative study on the treatment of Rockwood type III acute acromioclavicular dislocation: Clinical results from the TightRope technique vs. K-wire fixation.RockwoodⅢ型急性肩锁关节脱位治疗的比较研究:TightRope技术与克氏针固定的临床结果
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):171-176. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
7
Acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries treatment: Arthroscopic non-rigid coracoclavicular fixation provides better quality of life outcomes than hook plate ORIF.急性重度肩锁关节损伤的治疗:关节镜下非刚性喙锁固定比钩钢板切开复位内固定能提供更好的生活质量结果。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Feb;102(1):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Hook plate fixation for acute acromioclavicular dislocations without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a functional outcome study in military personnel.不进行喙锁韧带重建的钩钢板固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位:一项针对军事人员的功能预后研究
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2015 Aug;10(2):79-85. doi: 10.1007/s11751-015-0228-0. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
9
[Therapy of acute acromioclavicular joint instability. Meta-analysis of arthroscopic/minimally invasive versus open procedures].[急性肩锁关节不稳的治疗。关节镜/微创与开放手术的Meta分析]
Unfallchirurg. 2015 May;118(5):415-26. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0005-z.
10
Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature.肩锁关节分离关节镜固定术后并发症:文献系统综述
Open Access J Sports Med. 2015 Apr 10;6:97-107. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S73211. eCollection 2015.