Suppr超能文献

与环氧化酶-2选择性抑制剂和非选择性抗炎药相关的心血管血栓栓塞不良反应。

Cardiovascular thromboembolic adverse effects associated with cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and nonselective antiinflammatory drugs.

作者信息

Joshi Girish P, Gertler Ralph, Fricker Ruth

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9068, USA.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1793-804, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000286229.05723.50.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concerns of increased cardiovascular (CV) thromboembolic adverse effects from nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, both nonselective [NS]-NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase [COX]-2 selective inhibitors) have prevented their use despite numerous benefits.

METHODS

In this descriptive review, we critically examine the randomized, active- and placebo-controlled studies, observational trials, and meta-analyses evaluating the CV adverse effects associated with long-term and short-term use of COX-2 selective inhibitors and NS-NSAIDs. The potential mechanisms for these CV effects are also presented.

RESULTS

Although the studies evaluating the CV risks have limitations, there appears to be an increased CV risk with both COX-2 selective inhibitors and NS-NSAIDs, particularly in high-risk patients. Therefore, the United States Food and Drug Administration has given a similar "boxed" warning highlighting the potential for increased risk of CV events associated with their use. Nevertheless, there are differences in the CV risks between COX-2 selective inhibitors (e.g., higher CV risk with rofecoxib than celecoxib) as well as differences in the CV risks between individual NS-NSAIDs (e.g., higher CV risks with diclofenac than naproxen).

CONCLUSIONS

Until long-term, prospective, randomized, adequately powered, clinical studies in relevant patient populations have been completed, the CV risks associated with the use of NSAIDs, especially in high-risk patients, will likely continue to be controversial. Nevertheless, the benefits of their short-term (e.g., perioperative) use in patients without CV risks probably outweigh their potential CV adverse effects. Finally, careful risk/benefit assessment should be undertaken and both COX-2 selective inhibitors and NS-NSAIDs should be used with caution in patients with CV risk factors.

摘要

背景

尽管非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs,包括非选择性[NS]-NSAIDs和环氧化酶[COX]-2选择性抑制剂)有诸多益处,但由于担心其会增加心血管(CV)血栓栓塞不良反应,限制了它们的使用。

方法

在本描述性综述中,我们严格审查了评估COX-2选择性抑制剂和NS-NSAIDs长期及短期使用相关CV不良反应的随机、活性药物和安慰剂对照研究、观察性试验及荟萃分析。还介绍了这些CV效应的潜在机制。

结果

尽管评估CV风险的研究存在局限性,但COX-2选择性抑制剂和NS-NSAIDs似乎都增加了CV风险,尤其是在高危患者中。因此,美国食品药品监督管理局给出了类似的“黑框”警告,强调使用这些药物可能增加CV事件风险。然而,COX-2选择性抑制剂之间的CV风险存在差异(如罗非昔布的CV风险高于塞来昔布),个别NS-NSAIDs之间的CV风险也存在差异(如双氯芬酸的CV风险高于萘普生)。

结论

在相关患者群体中完成长期、前瞻性、随机、有足够效力的临床研究之前,NSAIDs使用相关的CV风险,尤其是在高危患者中,可能仍会存在争议。然而,在无CV风险的患者中短期(如围手术期)使用NSAIDs的益处可能超过其潜在的CV不良反应。最后,应进行仔细的风险/效益评估,对于有CV危险因素的患者,应谨慎使用COX-2选择性抑制剂和NS-NSAIDs。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验