Sauer William H, Bristow Michael R
Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Jan;21(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/s10840-007-9170-5. Epub 2007 Nov 28.
The Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial is one of several randomized trials that has demonstrated an improvement in morbidity and mortality with biventricular pacemakers and/or implantable defibrillators. Although the results of the COMPANION trial overlap with other trials investigating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), there are several unique aspects of the trial that warrant special attention. This review focuses on COMPANION in light of other CRT trials, and includes a discussion on the patient population enrolled, design challenges of the trial, the cost-effectiveness of CRT and CRT-D, and results of subanalyses using data collected during the trial.
心力衰竭的药物治疗、起搏治疗和除颤治疗比较(COMPANION)试验是多项随机试验之一,这些试验已证明双心室起搏器和/或植入式除颤器可改善发病率和死亡率。尽管COMPANION试验的结果与其他研究心脏再同步治疗(CRT)和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的试验有重叠,但该试验有几个独特之处值得特别关注。本综述结合其他CRT试验重点介绍COMPANION试验,内容包括对入组患者群体的讨论、试验的设计挑战、CRT和CRT-D的成本效益,以及利用试验期间收集的数据进行亚组分析的结果。