Parra Esteban J
Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada L5L 1C6.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;Suppl 45:85-105. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20727.
Pigmentation, which is primarily determined by the amount, the type, and the distribution of melanin, shows a remarkable diversity in human populations, and in this sense, it is an atypical trait. Numerous genetic studies have indicated that the average proportion of genetic variation due to differences among major continental groups is just 10-15% of the total genetic variation. In contrast, skin pigmentation shows large differences among continental populations. The reasons for this discrepancy can be traced back primarily to the strong influence of natural selection, which has shaped the distribution of pigmentation according to a latitudinal gradient. Research during the last 5 years has substantially increased our understanding of the genes involved in normal pigmentation variation in human populations. At least six genes have been identified using genotype/phenotype association studies and/or direct functional assays, and there is evidence indicating that several additional genes may be playing a role in skin, hair, and iris pigmentation. The information that is emerging from recent studies points to a complex picture where positive selection has been acting at different genomic locations, and for some genes only in certain population groups. There are several reasons why elucidating the genetics and evolutionary history of pigmentation is important. 1) Pigmentation is a trait that should be used as an example of how misleading simplistic interpretations of human variation can be. It is erroneous to extrapolate the patterns of variation observed in superficial traits such as pigmentation to the rest of the genome. It is similarly misleading to suggest, based on the "average" genomic picture, that variation among human populations is irrelevant. The study of the genes underlying human pigmentation diversity brings to the forefront the mosaic nature of human genetic variation: our genome is composed of a myriad of segments with different patterns of variation and evolutionary histories. 2) Pigmentation can be very useful to understand the genetic architecture of complex traits. The pigmentation of unexposed areas of the skin (constitutive pigmentation) is relatively unaffected by environmental influences during an individual's lifetime when compared with other complex traits such as diabetes or blood pressure, and this provides a unique opportunity to study gene-gene interactions without the effect of environmental confounders. 3) Pigmentation is of relevance from a public health perspective, because of its critical role in photoprotection and vitamin D synthesis. Fair-skinned individuals are at higher risk of several types of skin cancer, particularly in regions with high UVR incidence, and dark-skinned individuals living in high latitude regions are at higher risk for diseases caused by deficient or insufficient vitamin D levels.
色素沉着主要由黑色素的数量、类型和分布决定,在人类群体中表现出显著的多样性,从这个意义上说,它是一种非典型性状。大量基因研究表明,主要大陆群体之间差异导致的遗传变异平均比例仅占总遗传变异的10%-15%。相比之下,不同大陆人群的皮肤色素沉着存在很大差异。这种差异的原因主要可追溯到自然选择的强大影响,自然选择根据纬度梯度塑造了色素沉着的分布。过去5年的研究极大地增进了我们对参与人类群体正常色素沉着变异的基因的理解。通过基因型/表型关联研究和/或直接功能测定,至少已鉴定出6个基因,并且有证据表明其他几个基因可能在皮肤、头发和虹膜色素沉着中发挥作用。最近研究得出的信息指向了一个复杂的情况,即正选择在不同的基因组位置起作用,而且对于某些基因仅在特定人群组中起作用。阐明色素沉着的遗传学和进化史很重要,原因有以下几点。1) 色素沉着这一性状应被用作一个例子,说明对人类变异进行简单化解释可能会有多大的误导性。将在色素沉着等表面性状中观察到的变异模式外推到基因组的其他部分是错误的。同样具有误导性的是,基于 “平均” 基因组情况暗示人类群体之间的变异无关紧要。对人类色素沉着多样性背后基因的研究凸显了人类遗传变异的镶嵌性质:我们的基因组由无数具有不同变异模式和进化史的片段组成。2) 色素沉着对于理解复杂性状的遗传结构非常有用。与糖尿病或血压等其他复杂性状相比,皮肤未暴露部位的色素沉着(固有色素沉着)在个体一生中相对不受环境影响,这为研究基因-基因相互作用提供了一个独特的机会,而不受环境混杂因素的影响。3) 从公共卫生角度来看,色素沉着具有相关性,因为它在光保护和维生素D合成中起着关键作用。皮肤白皙的个体患几种皮肤癌的风险更高,特别是在紫外线辐射发生率高的地区,而生活在高纬度地区的深色皮肤个体患维生素D水平不足或缺乏引起的疾病的风险更高。