Suppr超能文献

佐芬普利与氨氯地平对高血压患者血压控制及反应率的比较

Blood pressure control and response rates with zofenopril compared with amlodipine in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Farsang Csaba

机构信息

First Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweiss University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Blood Press Suppl. 2007 Oct;2:19-24. doi: 10.1080/08038020701561737.

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium antagonists are today extensively used as first-line monotherapy as well as appropriate combination therapy in mild to moderate hypertension. In a parallel-group study, using clinically recommended doses, the ACEI zofenopril was compared with the calcium antagonist amlodipine in respect of their antihypertensive properties. In the study, 303 hypertensive patients, aged 18-75 years, were compared in terms of antihypertensive response and adverse effects after treatment with zofenopril, 30-60 mg once daily or amlodipine 5-10 mg od. After receiving the lower starting dose, up-titration was optional at 4 weeks to the higher dose if diastolic pressure (DBP) was 90 mmHg or more or if a decrease from base line of < 10 mmHg was present. After 4 weeks and appropriate up-titration of dose in non-responder patients, there were significant and similar reductions of sitting DBP by -10.0 and -9.9 mmHg and systolic blood pressure (SBP) by -13.0 and -13.2 mmHg the in the zofenopril and amlodipine groups, respectively. After 12 weeks of therapy, there were further reductions in blood pressure (BP) by the respective therapies. Thus, the higher zofenopril dose lowered SBP/DBP by 15.7/12.0 mmHg and the higher amlodipine dose by 17.1/ 12.2 mmHg (ns). Also, at the end of the study, the percentage of patients controlled (with sitting DBP < 90 mmHg) was 61.4% in the amlodipine and 62.2% in the zofenopril group and the percentage controlled (with sitting DBP < 90 mmHg and/or a decrease of at least 10 mmHg) was 76.4 in the amlodipine and 70.1 in the zofenopril groups (both ns). We conclude that SBP as well as DBP were substantially reduced in mild to moderate hypertensive patients over 12 weeks treatment with zofenopril or amlodipine in monotherapy. Thus, given the size of the BP reduction, such treatments are likely to produce beneficial cardiovascular outcome effects in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

摘要

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和钙拮抗剂如今被广泛用作轻度至中度高血压的一线单一疗法以及合适的联合疗法。在一项平行组研究中,使用临床推荐剂量,将ACEI佐芬普利与钙拮抗剂氨氯地平的降压特性进行了比较。在该研究中,对303名年龄在18至75岁的高血压患者进行了比较,这些患者分别接受佐芬普利(每日一次,30 - 60毫克)或氨氯地平(每日一次,5 - 10毫克)治疗后的降压反应和不良反应。在接受较低起始剂量后,如果舒张压(DBP)≥90 mmHg或较基线下降<10 mmHg,则在4周时可选择上调至较高剂量。在无反应患者中经过4周并适当上调剂量后,佐芬普利组和氨氯地平组的坐位DBP分别显著且相似地降低了-10.0和-9.9 mmHg,收缩压(SBP)分别降低了-13.0和-13.2 mmHg。治疗12周后,各自的治疗方法使血压(BP)进一步降低。因此,较高剂量的佐芬普利使SBP/DBP降低了15.7/12.0 mmHg,较高剂量的氨氯地平使SBP/DBP降低了17.1/12.2 mmHg(无显著性差异)。此外,在研究结束时,氨氯地平组坐位DBP<90 mmHg的患者百分比为61.4%,佐芬普利组为62.2%;坐位DBP<90 mmHg和/或至少下降10 mmHg的患者百分比,氨氯地平组为76.4%,佐芬普利组为70.1%(均无显著性差异)。我们得出结论,在轻度至中度高血压患者中,使用佐芬普利或氨氯地平单一疗法治疗12周后,SBP和DBP均显著降低。因此,鉴于血压降低的幅度,此类治疗可能会给轻度至中度高血压患者带来有益的心血管结局影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验