Winterhalter Michael, Schiller Jörg, Münte Sinika, Bund Michael, Hoy Ludwig, Weilbach Christoph, Piepenbrock Siegfried, Rahe-Meyer Niels
Department of Anaesthesiology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2008 Feb;22(1):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s10877-007-9107-7. Epub 2007 Nov 30.
The control mechanisms during general anesthesia include circulation parameters and vegetative reactions. A possible way to quantify vegetative reactions is to measure the impedance of the skin. An activation of the eccrine sweat glands via sympathetic sudomotor fibers induces a secretion of sweat, which generates a drop in skin impedance. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence which different stressors and measurement electrodes have upon skin impedance.
The changes in skin impedance and were measured after application of various stimuli (T1 value at rest, T2 acoustic stimulus, T3 visual stimulus, T4 tactile stimulus, T5 pain stimulus, T6 Valsalva manoeuvre, T7 forced inspiration/expiration). About 62 awake subjects underwent four standardized test sequences, during which several types of electrodes and recording sites (palmarly, plantarly) were explored.
All physiological (T6-T7) and external stimuli (T2-T5) led to significant changes in skin impedance (14.9 +/- 18.2 kOmega) and heart rate. These changes happened independently of BMI, gender and measurement electrode types. The time it took to react to the stimuli was significantly shorter for palmar applications than that obtained from plantar sites. The reaction times were as follows: palmarly 1.2 +/- 0.5 seconds for solidgel electrodes and 1.15 +/- 0.5 seconds for hydrogel electrodes, plantarly 2.3 +/- 1.0 seconds for solidgel electrodes and 2.21 +/- 1.2 seconds for hydrogel electrodes. The forced inspiration and expiration manoeuvres generated greater variations in skin impedance than did pain stimulus and acoustic stimulus. Measurements that were performed with solidgel electrodes revealed significantly greater average decreases in skin impedance following exposure to a stimulus.
CONCLUSION(S): External, but primarily also physiological stressors, generate direct and reproducible variations in skin impedance. Solidgel ECG electrodes should be used for all measurements.
全身麻醉期间的控制机制包括循环参数和自主反应。量化自主反应的一种可能方法是测量皮肤阻抗。通过交感神经汗腺纤维激活外分泌汗腺会诱导出汗,这会导致皮肤阻抗下降。本研究的目的是调查不同应激源和测量电极对皮肤阻抗的影响。
在施加各种刺激后(静息时的T1值、T2听觉刺激、T3视觉刺激、T4触觉刺激、T5疼痛刺激、T6瓦尔萨尔瓦动作、T7用力吸气/呼气)测量皮肤阻抗的变化。约62名清醒受试者接受了四个标准化测试序列,在此期间探索了几种类型的电极和记录部位(手掌、足底)。
所有生理(T6 - T7)和外部刺激(T2 - T5)均导致皮肤阻抗(14.9±18.2千欧)和心率发生显著变化。这些变化与体重指数、性别和测量电极类型无关。手掌部位对刺激的反应时间明显短于足底部位。反应时间如下:手掌部位,固体凝胶电极的反应时间为1.2±0.5秒,水凝胶电极的反应时间为1.15±0.5秒;足底部位,固体凝胶电极的反应时间为2.3±1.0秒,水凝胶电极的反应时间为2.21±1.2秒。用力吸气和呼气动作比疼痛刺激和听觉刺激在皮肤阻抗上产生的变化更大。使用固体凝胶电极进行的测量显示,暴露于刺激后皮肤阻抗的平均下降幅度明显更大。
外部刺激,但主要也是生理应激源,会在皮肤阻抗上产生直接且可重复的变化。所有测量均应使用固体凝胶心电图电极。