Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Physiol Res. 2021 Apr 30;70(2):265-272. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.934621. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
It has been suggested that sympathetic activity, measured as changes in electrical skin impedance (SI), can be used to assess the adequacy of general anesthesia. Our prospective study investigated if measurements of skin impedance can determine levels of sedation induced by midazolam. Twenty-seven patients scheduled for arthroscopy requiring general anesthesia were served as their own control. These were blinded to the order of injections by telling them that they will be randomly administered a placebo (saline) orsedative agent. A DM 3900 multimeter was used for SI measurements. The degree of sedation was measured using the modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (mOAAS) scale. Resting SI values were noted, and all participants were then administered the placebo followed 5 min later by midazolam 2 mg i.v. Five min after that, patients were administered standard general anesthesia with propofol, oxygen, nitrous oxide 60 %, and isoflurane 1 MAC via a laryngeal mask, and sufentanil 5 - 10 µg. SI significantly increased after administration of midazolam and induction of anesthesia. There were no significant differences between pre-administration (baseline) and placebo and end of surgery and end of anesthesia with closed eyes. There were highly significant differences (p<0.001) between pre-administration vs. midazolam, placebo vs. midazolam, pre-administration vs. induction of anesthesia. We found slight correlation between mOAAS and SI. There were no significant changes between the end of surgery and the end of anesthesia with closed eyes, but SI significantly decreased (p<0.01) after eyes opened.
有人提出,交感神经活动(以皮肤阻抗变化来衡量,SI)可用于评估全身麻醉的充分性。我们的前瞻性研究调查了皮肤阻抗测量是否可以确定咪达唑仑诱导镇静的程度。27 名计划接受需要全身麻醉的关节镜检查的患者作为自身对照。通过告诉他们将随机给予安慰剂(生理盐水)或镇静剂,使他们对注射顺序保持盲态。使用 DM 3900 多用表进行 SI 测量。使用改良的观察者警觉和镇静评分(mOAAS)量表测量镇静程度。记录静息 SI 值,然后所有参与者给予安慰剂,5 分钟后给予咪达唑仑 2mg 静脉注射。5 分钟后,患者通过喉罩给予丙泊酚、氧气、氧化亚氮 60%和异氟烷 1MAC 以及舒芬太尼 5-10μg 进行标准全身麻醉。咪达唑仑给药后和麻醉诱导后 SI 显著增加。给药前(基线)与安慰剂和闭眼手术结束与麻醉结束之间无显著差异。给药前与咪达唑仑、安慰剂与咪达唑仑、给药前与麻醉诱导之间存在高度显著差异(p<0.001)。我们发现 mOAAS 与 SI 之间存在轻度相关性。闭眼手术结束与麻醉结束之间无显著变化,但睁眼后 SI 显著降低(p<0.01)。