Rosemann Thomas, Joos Stefanie, Laux Gunter, Gensichen Jochen, Szecsenyi Joachim
University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1390-7. doi: 10.1002/art.23080.
To assess whether providing information on arthritis self-management through general practitioners (GPs) increases the quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis and whether additional case management provided by practice nurses shows better results.
We conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, controlled, 3-arm trial that included 1,021 patients from 75 primary care practices in Germany. GPs were randomized to intervention group I, group II, or a control group. GPs of both intervention groups participated in 2 peer group meetings. In intervention group II, additional case management was conducted via telephone by a practice nurse. The primary outcome was change in quality of life, assessed by the German version of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Short Form (AIMS2-SF). Secondary outcomes were health service utilization, prescriptions, and physical activity. Data were controlled for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 as a potential confounder.
Of 1,125 administered questionnaires, 1,021 were analyzed. Compared with the control group, no significant changes occurred in intervention group I with respect to the primary outcome. Performed radiographs decreased significantly (P = 0.050), whereas prescriptions of acetaminophen increased significantly (P < 0.001). In intervention group II, significant changes in the AIMS2-SF dimensions social (P < 0.001), symptom (P = 0.048), and lower body (P = 0.049) were identified. Radiographs (P = 0.031) and orthopedic referrals (P = 0.044) decreased whereas prescriptions of pain relievers increased significantly.
Improving the quality of life in patients with arthritis using arthritis self-management seems challenging. Simply providing this information through GPs is not sufficient but combining it with case management seems to be a promising approach.
评估通过全科医生(GP)提供关节炎自我管理信息是否能提高骨关节炎患者的生活质量,以及执业护士提供的额外病例管理是否能取得更好的效果。
我们进行了一项实用的、整群随机对照的三臂试验,纳入了德国75家初级保健机构的1021名患者。全科医生被随机分为干预组I、干预组II或对照组。两个干预组的全科医生都参加了2次同行小组会议。在干预组II中,执业护士通过电话进行额外的病例管理。主要结局是生活质量的变化,采用德文版关节炎影响测量量表简表(AIMS2-SF)进行评估。次要结局包括医疗服务利用、处方和身体活动。使用患者健康问卷9作为潜在混杂因素对抑郁数据进行控制。
在发放的1125份问卷中,分析了1021份。与对照组相比,干预组I在主要结局方面没有显著变化。进行的X光检查显著减少(P = 0.050),而对乙酰氨基酚的处方显著增加(P < 0.001)。在干预组II中,AIMS2-SF量表的社会维度(P < 0.001)、症状维度(P = 0.048)和下肢维度(P = 0.049)有显著变化。X光检查(P = 0.031)和骨科转诊(P = 0.044)减少,而止痛药的处方显著增加。
利用关节炎自我管理来提高关节炎患者的生活质量似乎具有挑战性。仅通过全科医生提供这些信息是不够的,但将其与病例管理相结合似乎是一种有前景的方法。