Suppr超能文献

实施初级保健中骨关节炎的核心 NICE 指南与模型咨询(MOSAICS):一项集群随机对照试验。

Implementing core NICE guidelines for osteoarthritis in primary care with a model consultation (MOSAICS): a cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Gloucestershire, UK.

出版信息

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Jan;26(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of a model osteoarthritis consultation, compared with usual care, on physical function and uptake of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) osteoarthritis recommendations, in adults ≥45 years consulting with peripheral joint pain in UK general practice.

METHOD

Two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with baseline health survey. Eight general practices in England.

PARTICIPANTS

525 adults ≥45 years consulting for peripheral joint pain, amongst 28,443 population survey recipients. Four intervention practices delivered the model osteoarthritis consultation to patients consulting with peripheral joint pain; four control practices continued usual care. The primary clinical outcome of the trial was the SF-12 physical component score (PCS) at 6 months; the main secondary outcome was uptake of NICE core recommendations by 6 months, measured by osteoarthritis quality indicators. A Linear Mixed Model was used to analyse clinical outcome data (SF-12 PCS). Differences in quality indicator outcomes were assessed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

525 eligible participants were enrolled (mean age 67.3 years, SD 10.5; 59.6% female): 288 from intervention and 237 from control practices. There were no statistically significant differences in SF-12 PCS: mean difference at the 6-month primary endpoint was -0.37 (95% CI -2.32, 1.57). Uptake of core NICE recommendations by 6 months was statistically significantly higher in the intervention arm compared with control: e.g., increased written exercise information, 20.5% (7.9, 28.3).

CONCLUSION

Whilst uptake of core NICE recommendations was increased, there was no evidence of benefit of this intervention, as delivered in this pragmatic randomised trial, on the primary outcome of physical functioning at 6 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN06984617.

摘要

目的

比较模型骨关节炎咨询与常规护理对英国普通实践中≥45 岁有外周关节疼痛就诊的成年人的身体功能和英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NICE)骨关节炎建议的采用情况,以确定模型骨关节炎咨询的有效性。

方法

一项具有基线健康调查的两臂聚类随机对照试验。在英格兰的 8 个普通实践中进行。

参与者

28443 名人群调查接受者中有 525 名≥45 岁因外周关节疼痛就诊的成年人。4 个干预实践为有外周关节疼痛就诊的患者提供模型骨关节炎咨询;4 个对照实践继续常规护理。试验的主要临床结局是 6 个月时的 SF-12 生理成分评分(PCS);主要次要结局是 6 个月时采用 NICE 核心建议,通过骨关节炎质量指标来衡量。使用线性混合模型分析临床结局数据(SF-12 PCS)。使用逻辑回归评估质量指标结果的差异。

结果

纳入了 525 名符合条件的参与者(平均年龄 67.3 岁,标准差 10.5;59.6%为女性):干预组 288 名,对照组 237 名。在 SF-12 PCS 方面没有统计学上的显著差异:主要终点 6 个月时的平均差异为-0.37(95%置信区间-2.32,1.57)。与对照组相比,干预组在 6 个月时核心 NICE 建议的采用率统计学上显著更高:例如,增加书面运动信息的比例为 20.5%(7.9,28.3)。

结论

尽管核心 NICE 建议的采用率有所增加,但在这项实用随机试验中,这种干预措施在 6 个月时的主要身体功能结局方面没有证据表明有益。

试验注册

ISRCTN06984617。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92cb/5759997/4443cc1caf4f/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验