Suppr超能文献

多焦点人工晶状体的图像质量及瞳孔大小的影响:折射型和折射-衍射混合型设计的比较

Image quality with multifocal intraocular lenses and the effect of pupil size: comparison of refractive and hybrid refractive-diffractive designs.

作者信息

Artigas José M, Menezo José L, Peris Cristina, Felipe Adelina, Díaz-Llopis Manuel

机构信息

Fundación Oftalmológica del Mediterráneo, Departamento de Optica, Facultad de Física, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.035.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the image quality with a refractive and 2 hybrid refractive-diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in vitro to determine the IOL modulation transfer function (MTF) following the EN-ISO international standard for distance and near vision and to study the IOLs' behavior with different pupil sizes.

SETTING

Fundación Oftalmológica del Mediterráneo, Valencia, Spain.

METHODS

This study evaluated 4 IOLs: the hybrid refractive-diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3 (Alcon) and Tecnis ZM900 (AMO), the refractive ReZoom NXG (AMO), and the monofocal AcrySof SN60WF (Alcon). The MTF was calculated from the cross-line spread function recorded with the OPAL Vector System (Image Science Ltd.) using fast Fourier transform techniques. The artificial eye model simulated in vivo conditions of the anterior chamber and included an artificial cornea and physiological solution, in which the IOLs were positioned. The pupil sizes varied between 2.0 mm and 5.0 mm in steps of 0.5 mm.

RESULTS

For distance vision and small pupils (2.0 to 3.5 mm), the refractive IOL provided better image quality than the 2 hybrid IOLs. When the pupil was larger, the distance vision was similar with all IOLs. The 2 hybrid IOLs gave better image quality than the refractive IOL for near vision with any pupil size. With the refractive IOL and pupils smaller than 3.5 mm, near focusing did not occur, resulting in poor image quality. Of the hybrid IOLs, the AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3 provided better distance image quality and the Tecnis ZM900 provided better near image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The refractive IOL gave better image quality than the hybrid IOLs at distance and with small pupils. With pupils larger than 3.5 mm, the quality was similar. Hybrid IOLs gave significantly better image quality for near vision with all pupil sizes. AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3 IOLs give better distance vision than Tecnis ZM900 IOLs; the latter gave better near vision. The reference monofocal IOL provided better distance images than any multifocal IOL with all pupil sizes.

摘要

目的

在体外分析一款折射型和两款折衍混合多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)的图像质量,按照EN - ISO国际标准测定IOL的调制传递函数(MTF)用于远视力和近视力,并研究不同瞳孔大小情况下IOL的表现。

地点

西班牙巴伦西亚地中海眼科基金会。

方法

本研究评估了4款IOL:折衍混合的AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3(爱尔康)和Tecnis ZM900(眼力健),折射型的ReZoom NXG(眼力健),以及单焦点的AcrySof SN60WF(爱尔康)。MTF由使用快速傅里叶变换技术通过OPAL Vector System(图像科学有限公司)记录的交叉线扩展函数计算得出。人工眼模型模拟了前房的体内条件,包括人工角膜和生理溶液,IOL置于其中。瞳孔大小在2.0毫米至5.0毫米之间以0.5毫米为步长变化。

结果

对于远视力和小瞳孔(2.0至3.5毫米),折射型IOL比两款折衍混合IOL提供更好的图像质量。当瞳孔较大时,所有IOL的远视力相似。两款折衍混合IOL在任何瞳孔大小下对于近视力都比折射型IOL提供更好的图像质量。对于折射型IOL且瞳孔小于3.5毫米时,近聚焦未发生,导致图像质量较差。在折衍混合IOL中,AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3提供更好的远距图像质量,而Tecnis ZM#FormatImgID_0# 0提供更好的近距图像质量。

结论

折射型IOL在远距和小瞳孔情况下比折衍混合IOL提供更好的图像质量。对于大于3.5毫米的瞳孔,图像质量相似。折衍混合IOL在所有瞳孔大小下对于近视力都显著提供更好的图像质量。AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3 IOL比Tecnis ZM900 IOL提供更好的远视力;后者提供更好的近视力。参考单焦点IOL在所有瞳孔大小下比任何多焦点IOL提供更好的远距图像。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验